JUNIORMETRICS

Puma Exploration Inc.

PUMXF·PUMA·US$0.085 (CAD 0.12)·US$17.3M cap
Goldalso:Williams Brook Gold Project (Northern New Brunswick, Canada) Map

Puma Exploration Inc. is a Rimouski-headquartered explorer and the largest claim owner in Northern New Brunswick, Canada. Its stage is set by the Legacy Cu-Ag deposit, held through its ~71.6%-owned subsidiary Murray Brook Minerals Inc. (MBM, 23,644,165 of 33,044,165 shares), which owns the Legacy Project 100%: MBM released an updated NI 43-101 Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate with an effective date of 28 November 2025 (report dated 20 February 2026), compiled by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. with Dr. Gilles Arseneau, P.Geo. as independent competent person -- 930,000 tonnes Inferred at 0.66% Cu and 3.65 g/t Ag, containing 13,400,000 lb copper and 110,000 oz silver, reported in-pit at a >US$10/t cut-off within a Whittle-optimised pit shell designed at 45-degree slope angles. The estimate was compiled to satisfy listing requirements for a TSX Venture Exchange Tier 2 application, and MBM is working toward a separate TSXV listing on a structure similar to the 2022 Canadian Copper transaction; MBM also acquired the Mount McInnes project in August 2026. Puma's directly-held exploration focus is the ~40,000-hectare Williams Brook Gold Project near Bathurst, under an earn-in/option arrangement with Kinross Gold Corp. (signed Oct 2024; Kinross can earn 65% by funding a minimum $16.75M in exploration over 2025-2030), which is funding drilling: a Winter 2026 program (~12 holes, 2,300+ m) targeted the Jaguar and Lion Gold Zones, returning 0.45 g/t Au over 56.50 m (incl. 1.03 g/t Au over 16.0 m) at Jaguar and 16 g/t Au over 0.50 m in the first-ever drilling at Lion; a Summer 2026 field program (mapping, prospecting, soil sampling, IP surveys) followed, and Kinross launched a further ~2,000m Jaguar Gold Zone drill program on 26 July 2026. The company self-funds its own 100%-owned McKenzie Gold Project (New Brunswick), which straddles the McKenzie Fault: a fully-funded 2026 42,000ha surface program plus an inaugural 2,721m diamond drill program at the RIM Gold Zone returned high-grade veins (incl. 42.60 g/t Au over 0.25m). It previously held the Turgeon Cu-Zn VMS project in New Brunswick, sold to Raptor Resources Ltd. in a 2024 transaction alongside Canadian Copper Inc. No resource estimate has been published for Williams Brook or McKenzie themselves. Note: TSXV ticker "PUMA" is unrelated to Puma SE (Frankfurt/XETRA: PUM/PUMG), the sportswear brand -- a real search/data-feed confusion risk.

Notable vs. Peers

  • Financials score of 3.7/10 is weaker than the peer average of 5.3/10.

Lifecycle Milestones

Grassroots
Resource Def.Current
PEA
PFS
Feasibility
Permitting
Construction
Production
5.4/10
Weak track recordStrong track record
5.4/10 vs.
3.7/10
Thin runwayWell-capitalized
3.7/10 vs.
How this is calculated
Not yet researched
Weaker depositStronger deposit
How this is calculated
6.6/10
Harder place to buildEasier place to build
6.6/10 vs.
What goes into it
  • Jurisdiction (40%)9/10

    New Brunswick: Fraser PPI 2025 is 82.55 of 100 (rank 20 of 68), which maps to 9 on this site's scale. New Brunswick, Canada -- Tier-1 mining jurisdiction.

  • Infrastructure (40%)No verified figure

    Researched with nothing found: no source we could cite confirms or rules out an existing mill, road access, grid power, or tailings facility at Williams Brook Gold Project, Northern New Brunswick, Canada (checked Sep 26, 2026; recheck due Mar 25, 2027). Counts at a neutral 5/10 until one does.

  • Nearby producing mine (20%)Not yet researched

    No project coordinates on file yet, so distance to a producing mine can't be measured.

5.2/10
Weaker profileStronger profile
5.2/10 vs.
Price Chart
$0.065$0.122$0.10$0.093$0.082AugDecMarJulOct
Aug 12, 2025 – Oct 20, 2026
Stage changeNews
$0.085
+10.6%from low-51.3%from high
$0.077$0.18
See who ↓
19.1%
Low alignmentHigh alignment
19.1% vs.
See who ↓
0%
Low alignmentHigh alignment
0% vs.
$17.3M
Far belowFar above
$17.3M vs. $22.1M peer median
Price (USD - Local)
US$0.085 (CAD 0.12)
Cash Position (USD)
$1.3M
Far belowFar above
$1.3M vs. $3.4M peer median
Debt (USD)
Far aboveFar below
$0 vs. $0 peer median
$16M
Far belowFar above
$16M vs. $19.4M peer median
202.6M
Far aboveFar below
202.6M vs. 153.6M peer median
Jurisdiction
Canada
Grassroots/advanced exploration, no active mine
19.1%
0%100%
19.1% vs. 12.1% peer median
0%
0%100%
0% vs. 3.3% peer median
-$2.5M
Far belowFar above
-$2.5M vs. -$3.3M peer median
-$0.012
Far belowFar above
-$0.012 vs. -$0.018 peer median

Acquisition Susceptibility

How this is calculated
6/10
Unlikely bolt-onFits the takeout profile

A relative ranking of how closely this company matches the profile of juniors that have actually been acquired — not a probability, and not a reason to buy. Acquisitions are rare: only a few dozen significant deals happen a year across a universe of thousands of juniors, so even a high score here describes a long shot. The strongest signal in the research, a producer that already owns part of the company, is scored from its disclosed strategic shareholders. A producer that is a joint-venture or earn-in partner on the project, rather than a shareholder, isn't captured yet.

How this score is built

  • Disclosed pending deal
    Sub-score: Not scored

    No pending acquisition or merger disclosed (checked)

    Not scored: having no deal in flight isn't held against a company.

    Weight 26.25%
  • Producer's strategic stake
    Sub-score: Not scored

    No producer holds a disclosed stake on file (holder register researched) See holders

    Not scored: most juniors that do get bought had no prior toehold, so a missing stake says little either way.

    Weight 25%
  • Distance to a producing mine
    Sub-score: Not yet researched

    Distance not yet researched: no project coordinates on file

    Distance can't be measured without coordinates, so excluded rather than counted as far.

    Weight 22.5%
  • Lifecycle stage
    Sub-score:
    3.5/10

    Stage: Resource Definition

    Feasibility and permitting score 10, where deals cluster, and production 5.5; earlier stages score less, down to 1 at grassroots.

    Weight 15% · 57% here
  • Jurisdiction
    Sub-score:
    9/10

    Canada: jurisdiction score 9/10

    Our jurisdiction score, used as is: higher means lower political and permitting risk.

    Weight 6.75% · 26% here
  • Commodity
    Sub-score:
    10/10

    Primary commodity: Gold

    Gold 10, copper 8, silver 5, nickel and uranium 4, others 2: most majors' deals are for gold.

    Weight 4.5% · 17% here

Weight is each input's share of the full score. “Here” is its share of this company's score: inputs that aren't scored are left out and the rest re-weighted, never counted as zero.

Overall Score Trend
-45.3% since 2026-08-26 · -45.3% from peak

Your Rankings

Community Sentiment
—SELLINGBUYING
CategoryCommunityYour Ranking
Overall— (0) 
Management— (0) 
Financials— (0) 
Jurisdiction— (0) 
Project Quality— (0) 
Prospect Generation & Joint Ventures

Puma Exploration Inc. generates and stakes exploration projects, then brings in joint-venture partners to fund the drilling in exchange for Puma retaining a carried interest, royalty, or reduced equity stake — spreading exposure across multiple projects while avoiding the shareholder dilution a self-funded drill program requires. The projects below are the company's own designated material/flagship JVs; only figures the company has actually disclosed are shown, nothing here is estimated.

Synthetic Profitability
Synthetic Revenue (committed-spend basis)
$5.9M
Synthetic Profit
Not yet computed — operating expenses not on file

Rick Rule's framework: synthetic revenue = partner spend x retained carry %; synthetic profit = total synthetic revenue minus real operating costs. Based on 1 of 2 tracked JVs with both a committed spend and a retained equity percentage on file. Computed from the JV partner's disclosed spending commitment (deal size), not actual cumulative spend to date: spend-to-date isn't reported, so this uses the commitment. Early in a multi-year earn-in the two can differ substantially, so treat this as an upper-bound, illustrative figure, not Rick Rule's literal "gross expenditures to date" measure. Royalty-only JVs (a royalty percentage with no retained carried-interest percentage) aren't included, since they have no carry for a partner's spend to be multiplied against.

Tracked projects (2)
Material/flagship JVs, not the full staked portfolio — expect this to be smaller than the portfolio counts above
ProjectCommodityJV PartnerRetainedPartner Earn-InCommitted SpendSynthetic RevenueSpend ActiveStage
Williams Brook (incl. Jonpol, Portage)
Canada (New Brunswick)
Kinross Gold Corp. holds an option agreement (signed Oct 2024) to earn a 65% interest in Puma's Williams Brook Gold Project (~40,000ha, incl. the Williams Brook, Jonpol and Portage properties, near Bathurst, New Brunswick) by funding a minimum $16.75M in exploration expenditures over 2025-2030.
Gold35% project interestup to 65%$16.8MMinimum $16.75M in exploration expenditures over 2025-2030 for 65%.$5.9MGrassroots Exploration
McKenzie Gold Project
Canada (New Brunswick)
Puma's 100%-owned, self-funded and self-operated New Brunswick gold flagship -- the defining trait making Puma a hybrid rather than a pure prospect generator alongside its Williams Brook (Kinross) JV.
GoldNo JV yet100% project interest———Grassroots Exploration

Management Team

President and Chief Executive Officer of Puma Exploration Inc. since 2010. Professional geologist (P.Geo.) leading the company's effort to build Canada's newest gold camp in Northern New Brunswick.

Executive Chairman of the Board of Puma Exploration Inc. Director with 42+ years of experience in the mining sector.

Chief Financial Officer of Puma Exploration Inc. Certified public accountant with 35 years of experience managing public companies, advising on capital market transactions and providing financial stewardship. President of Montreal-based SKTM Financial Corporation Ltd., currently CFO of several publicly listed mining and mineral exploration companies.

Head of Investor Relations & Director of Puma Exploration Inc. Senior executive with 30 years of experience in corporate management, the last ten focused on the junior resource sector; most recently President & CEO of MacDonald Mines Exploration Ltd.

Insiders, Investors & Smart Money

Notable shareholders and insiders whose involvement is worth knowing about, plus what we're seeing from institutional/large-investor activity.

Smart money
1/10

No institutional holder is on record. A director has been making small, frequent purchases on the open market through August 2026.

No notable insiders tracked for this miner yet.

Reports, Presentations & Documents

Technical Report Takeaways

We haven't parsed this company's PEA/PFS/FS recommendations yet — cut-off grade, mine life, DCF/NPV, and the report's own next-steps guidance are a planned research pass, not live data for every company yet.