JUNIORMETRICS

Skeena Resources Limited

SKE·SKE·US$31.38 (CAD 44.12)·US$3.9B cap
Goldalso:Multi-asset portfolio (Eskay Creek Gold-Silver Project, construction flagship; Snip Gold Project, past-producing satellite; Golden Triangle, British Columbia, Canada) Map

Skeena Resources (rebranding publicly as Skeena Gold + Silver) is rebuilding the past-producing Eskay Creek mine in BC's Golden Triangle as a low-cost, high-grade open-pit operation. Construction is roughly halfway complete, with initial production targeted for Q2 2027.

Notable vs. Peers

  • All-in sustaining cost of $300/oz is 84% lower than the peer producer average of $1,824/oz.
  • Financials score of 2.2/10 is weaker than the peer average of 6.5/10.

Lifecycle Milestones

Grassroots
Resource Def.
PEA
PFS
Feasibility
Permitting
ConstructionCurrent
Production

Construction Milestones

3 of 5 reached
  1. Feb 2026 · Source
  2. Jun 2024 · Source
  3. Reached — date not disclosed
  4. Not yet reached
    Expected Q2 2027 · Initial production at Eskay Creek; commercial production targeted Q3 2027 · Source
  5. Not yet reached

Milestones are recorded only from a company's own dated disclosure. A milestone with no date shown is one we can confirm was reached but for which no date was disclosed — we don't estimate one. "Not yet reached" means exactly that, not that a date is missing. An "Expected" line likewise only ever reflects the company's own guidance (e.g. a study or permit decision targeted for a stated quarter) — most not-yet-reached milestones have none, and that absence means no such guidance has been disclosed, not that one is overdue.

Prior Ownership & Infrastructure
Eskay Creek Gold-Silver Project, British Columbia, Canada
Tailings FacilityRoad Access4.3/10 built out

Not in place: mill, grid power.

Combined view across 2 projects. Figures below are only combined where the underlying basis genuinely matches -- see the notes under each.

Combined resource
5.2M oz Au
Sum of 2 of 2 projects with a disclosed figure
IRR, per project
  • 43%Eskay Creek Gold-Silver Project, British Columbia, Canada
Each project's own figure -- IRR is not additive across independent projects, so these are never combined
Mine life, per project
  • 12 yrsEskay Creek Gold-Silver Project, British Columbia, Canada
Each project's own figure -- independent mine lives are never added or averaged
Combined NPV, by discount-rate basis
$1.5B
At 5% discount rate -- Eskay Creek Gold-Silver Project, British Columbia, Canada
6.9/10
Weak track recordStrong track record
6.9/10 vs.
2.2/10
Thin runwayWell-capitalized
2.2/10 vs.
How this is calculated
6.7/10
Weaker depositStronger deposit
6.7/10 vs.
How this is calculated
7.2/10
Harder place to buildEasier place to build
7.2/10 vs.
What goes into it
  • Jurisdiction (40%)9/10

    British Columbia: Fraser PPI 2025 is 74.28 of 100 (rank 31 of 68), which maps to 9 on this site's scale. British Columbia, Canada — fully permitted project in a stable, mining-friendly province.

  • Infrastructure (40%)4.3/10

    No confirmed mill, confirmed road access, no confirmed grid power, and a confirmed tailings facility at Eskay Creek Gold-Silver Project, British Columbia, Canada.

  • Nearby producing mine (20%)9.6/10

    Brucejack (Newmont Corporation) is 25 km away -- within regional-platform range.

5.8/10
Weaker profileStronger profile
5.8/10 vs.
Price Chart
$15.02$18.87$26.02$27.12$31.60JulNovMarJulOct20
Jul 25, 2025 – Oct 20, 2026
News
$31.38
+105.3%from low-16.3%from high
$15.28$37.48
See who ↓
2.6%
Low alignmentHigh alignment
2.6% vs.
See who ↓
76.4%
Low alignmentHigh alignment
76.4% vs.
$3.9B
Far belowFar above
$3.9B vs. $541.2M peer median
Price (USD - Local)
US$31.38 (CAD 44.12)
Cash Position (USD)
$95M
Far belowFar above
$95M vs. $91.1M peer median
Debt (USD)
$743.8M
Far aboveFar below
$743.8M vs. $6.2M peer median
$4.5B
Far belowFar above
$4.5B vs. $457.8M peer median
124.1M
Far aboveFar below
124.1M vs. 336.8M peer median
Jurisdiction
Canada
5,235,000 oz
Feeds Deposit Quality score
Measured3,139,000 oz
Indicated2,096,000 oz
Inferrednot scored181,000 oz
Total resource5,416,000 oz
Far belowFar above
5.2M oz vs. 1.3M oz peer median
Compares M&I only — Inferred isn't compared or scored.
$867.72/oz
M&I
Total resource (incl. Inferred)$838.72/oz
Peer median $67.95/oz
Far aboveFar below
$867.72/oz vs. $132.92/oz peer median
0.0869 oz/tCut-off: Eskay Creek: 0.7 g/t AuEq (pit-constrained), 3.2 g/t AuEq (underground, drift-and-fill stope shapes), US$1,700/oz Au and US$23/oz Ag; Snip: 2.5 g/t Au (underground long-hole stope shapes, US$1,700/oz Au)
Far belowFar above
0.0869 oz/t vs. 0.0379 oz/t peer median
Open pit
12 yrs2023 study
Far belowFar above
12 yrs vs. 11.1 yrs peer median
$300/oz2023 study
@5%$1.5B2023 study · gold deck US$1,800 vs spot US$4,114/oz
Far belowFar above
$1.5B vs. $602M peer median
2.63x2023 study · gold deck US$1,800 vs spot US$4,114/oz
Far aboveFar below
2.63x vs. 0.32x peer median
3.07x2023 study · gold deck US$1,800 vs spot US$4,114/oz
Far aboveFar below
3.07x vs. 0.29x peer median
$527.5M2023 study
Far aboveFar below
$527.5M vs. $276.5M peer median
2.8xClears Durrett's 2:1 bar2023 study · gold deck US$1,800 vs spot US$4,114/oz
Far belowFar above
2.8x vs. 2.3x peer median
$1,800/oz56% below spot ($4,114/oz)2023 study
43%Clears Durrett's 25% developer bar2023 study · gold deck US$1,800 vs spot US$4,114/oz
Far belowFar above
43% vs. 43% peer median
2.6%
0%100%
2.6% vs. 12.1% peer median
76.4%
0%100%
76.4% vs. 3.3% peer median
25 kmfrom Newmont Corporation's Brucejack
Within regional-platform range (~50km)
$264.3M
Far belowFar above
$264.3M vs. $592.2M peer median
$2.13
Far belowFar above
$2.13 vs. $2.02 peer median

Acquisition Susceptibility

How this is calculated
7.8/10
Unlikely bolt-onFits the takeout profile

A relative ranking of how closely this company matches the profile of juniors that have actually been acquired — not a probability, and not a reason to buy. Acquisitions are rare: only a few dozen significant deals happen a year across a universe of thousands of juniors, so even a high score here describes a long shot. The strongest signal in the research, a producer that already owns part of the company, is scored from its disclosed strategic shareholders. A producer that is a joint-venture or earn-in partner on the project, rather than a shareholder, isn't captured yet.

How this score is built

  • Disclosed pending deal
    Sub-score: Not scored

    No pending acquisition or merger disclosed (checked)

    Not scored: having no deal in flight isn't held against a company.

    Weight 26.25%
  • Producer's strategic stake
    Sub-score: Not scored

    No producer holds a disclosed stake on file (holder register researched) See holders

    Not scored: most juniors that do get bought had no prior toehold, so a missing stake says little either way.

    Weight 25%
  • Distance to a producing mine
    Sub-score:
    7.5/10

    Nearest producing mine: Brucejack (Newmont Corporation), 25 km

    10 next to a producing mine, 8 at 20 km, 5 at 50 km, 0 beyond 200 km.

    Weight 22.5% · 46% here
  • Lifecycle stage
    Sub-score:
    7/10

    Stage: Construction

    Feasibility and permitting score 10, where deals cluster, and production 5.5; earlier stages score less, down to 1 at grassroots.

    Weight 15% · 31% here
  • Jurisdiction
    Sub-score:
    9/10

    Canada: jurisdiction score 9/10

    Our jurisdiction score, used as is: higher means lower political and permitting risk.

    Weight 6.75% · 14% here
  • Commodity
    Sub-score:
    10/10

    Primary commodity: Gold

    Gold 10, copper 8, silver 5, nickel and uranium 4, others 2: most majors' deals are for gold.

    Weight 4.5% · 9% here

Weight is each input's share of the full score. “Here” is its share of this company's score: inputs that aren't scored are left out and the rest re-weighted, never counted as zero.

Overall Score Trend
-21.6% since 2026-07-23 · -21.6% from peak

Your Rankings

Community Sentiment
—SELLINGBUYING
CategoryCommunityYour Ranking
Overall— (0) 
Management— (0) 
Financials— (0) 
Jurisdiction— (0) 
Project Quality— (0) 

Management Team

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Skeena Resources Limited (Skeena Gold + Silver) since 2023. BASc (Mining and Mineral Processing); MScEng (Rock Mechanics); Graduate Diploma in Business Administration; Professional Engineer. 30+ years of mining operations, project development and start-up experience. Career: ~10 years at Cominco Ltd. operations including the Snip Mine; GM of Bema Gold Corp.'s Julietta Mine then GM of Operations for the Kupol Mine (Russia) development, through Kinross Gold's 2007 acquisition of Bema Gold, continuing there through further international assignments (Brazil, Nevada, Kazakhstan); VP Operations at B2Gold Corp., including GM at the Fekola Mine (Mali), 2013-2022, immediately before Skeena Resources.

Executive Chairman of Skeena Resources Limited (Skeena Gold + Silver) since 2022. BA (Economics), University of Richmond. Entered mining through a mineral resource discovered on his family's farmland in Virginia. Career: 8 years in investment banking with Cadence Investment Partners and UBS Investment Bank (Senior Research Analyst, High Yield Group, New York), 2000-2008; 20 years leading TSX Venture-listed junior companies as CEO/President/Director, including Anthem Resources, Inc. (2010-2015), Ibero Mining Corp. and 1289625 BC Ltd. (2017-2020), immediately before Skeena Resources.

Chief Financial Officer of Skeena Resources Limited (Skeena Gold + Silver) since Jul 2016; also a director of Winshear Metals Corp. Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA, CA); BSc (Hons, Physics), University of British Columbia. 25+ years of leadership in publicly listed exploration and mining companies. Career: began at PricewaterhouseCoopers; held concurrent/sequential CFO and Corporate Secretary roles at FireFox Gold Corp. (founder, 2005-2020), Winshear Metals Corp. (2007-2021), Coast Copper Corp. (2011-2017) and Helio Resource Corp., plus CFO of the Canadian Cancer Society, immediately before Skeena Resources.

Insiders, Investors & Smart Money

Notable shareholders and insiders whose involvement is worth knowing about, plus what we're seeing from institutional/large-investor activity.

Smart money
3/10

Skeena is 76% institutionally owned and genuine resource specialists are on the register -- Orion Resource Partners, a dedicated mining investor, and Sprott Inc -- but none of them is disclosed at a size that would count as a real conviction stake, and the largest single line is BlackRock, which is index money. Insiders cut both ways: Randy Reichert and Walter Coles Jr. each bought small amounts on the open market in May and July 2026, while six insiders sold roughly US$14M of stock over the same period.

No notable insiders tracked for this miner yet.

Reports, Presentations & Documents

Technical Report Takeaways

Skeena Resources, which is rebranding as Skeena Gold + Silver, is building the past-producing Eskay Creek gold-silver mine in British Columbia's Golden Triangle as an open-pit operation; it received the final environmental permit, jointly with the Tahltan Central Government, on 3 February 2026. Company-wide measured and indicated resources are 5,235,000 oz of gold (3,139,000 oz measured, 2,096,000 oz indicated), inclusive of reserves, with 181,000 oz inferred: 4,412,000 oz at Eskay Creek (June 2023 estimate) and 823,000 oz at the 100%-owned past-producing Snip mine, which is being studied as a satellite feed. The November 2023 Eskay Creek definitive feasibility study shows an after-tax NPV5% of US$1.48B (CAD 2.0B) and a 43% IRR at US$1,800/oz gold and US$23/oz silver, with initial capital of US$528M (CAD 712.9M), a 12-year mine life and a life-of-mine all-in sustaining cost of US$300/oz net of silver credits. Skeena completed a US$750M senior secured notes offering in April 2026; initial production is targeted for Q2 2027 and commercial production for Q3 2027. A combined Eskay Creek and Snip technical report is due in late 2026.