JUNIORMETRICS

Saga Metals Corp.S

SAGMF·SAGA·US$0.22 (CAD 0.32)·US$17.8M cap
UraniumDouble Mer Uranium Project (Labrador, Canada) -- flagship; also Radar Titanium-Vanadium-Iron Project (Labrador) Map

Saga Metals Corp. (TSXV: SAGA; formerly Saga Lithium Corp., renamed January 2024 -- the pre-rename lithium focus is stale and no longer this company's driver), Vancouver-headquartered, holds 100% of the Double Mer Uranium Project in Labrador (1,024 claims, 25,600 hectares, 90km northeast of Happy Valley-Goose Bay near the prolific Central Mineral Belt), an IOCG/pegmatite-style uranium system with an 18km east-west mineralised trend (three zones: Luivik, Nanuk, Katjuk) and grab samples up to 0.428% U3O8. Separately holds the Radar Titanium-Vanadium-Iron Project (24,175 hectares), a layered mafic intrusion hosting vanadiferous titanomagnetite and ilmenite, with 10,353m drilled to date.

Notable vs. Peers

  • Trading within 4% of its 52-week low — weak recent price momentum.

Lifecycle Milestones

GrassrootsCurrent
Resource Def.
PEA
PFS
Feasibility
Permitting
Construction
Production
5.9/10
Weak track recordStrong track record
5.9/10 vs.
5.3/10
Thin runwayWell-capitalized
5.3/10 vs.
How this is calculated
Not yet researched
Weaker depositStronger deposit
How this is calculated
6.6/10
Harder place to buildEasier place to build
6.6/10 vs.
What goes into it
  • Jurisdiction (40%)9/10

    Newfoundland and Labrador: Fraser PPI 2025 is 93.01 of 100 (rank 7 of 68), which maps to 9 on this site's scale. Labrador, Canada is a Tier-1, well-established mining jurisdiction with stable rule of law.

  • Infrastructure (40%)No verified figure

    Researched with nothing found: no source we could cite confirms or rules out an existing mill, road access, grid power, or tailings facility at Double Mer Uranium Project, Labrador, Canada (checked Sep 26, 2026; recheck due Mar 25, 2027). Counts at a neutral 5/10 until one does.

  • Nearby producing mine (20%)Not yet researched

    No project coordinates on file yet, so distance to a producing mine can't be measured.

5.7/10
Weaker profileStronger profile
5.7/10 vs.
Price Chart
$0.243$0.35$0.379$0.336$0.229SepDecAprJulOct
Sep 17, 2025 – Oct 15, 2026
News
$0.22
+11.1%from low-68.3%from high
$0.20$0.70
$17.8M
Far belowFar above
$17.8M vs. $16.9M peer median
Price (USD - Local)
US$0.22 (CAD 0.32)
Cash Position (USD)
$3.8M
Far belowFar above
$3.8M vs. $7.1M peer median
Debt (USD)
$0
Far aboveFar below
$0 vs. $0 peer median
$14M
Far belowFar above
$14M vs. $13.4M peer median
80.1M
Far aboveFar below
80.1M vs. 146.3M peer median
Jurisdiction
Canada
-$6.6M
Far belowFar above
-$6.6M vs. -$5.4M peer median
-$0.082
Far belowFar above
-$0.082 vs. -$0.023 peer median

Acquisition Susceptibility

How this is calculated
3.6/10
Unlikely bolt-onFits the takeout profile

A relative ranking of how closely this company matches the profile of juniors that have actually been acquired — not a probability, and not a reason to buy. Acquisitions are rare: only a few dozen significant deals happen a year across a universe of thousands of juniors, so even a high score here describes a long shot. The strongest signal in the research, a producer that already owns part of the company, is scored from its disclosed strategic shareholders. A producer that is a joint-venture or earn-in partner on the project, rather than a shareholder, isn't captured yet.

How this score is built

  • Disclosed pending deal
    Sub-score: Not scored

    No pending acquisition or merger disclosed (checked)

    Not scored: having no deal in flight isn't held against a company.

    Weight 26.25%
  • Producer's strategic stake
    Sub-score: Not scored

    No producer holds a disclosed stake on file (holder register researched) See holders

    Not scored: most juniors that do get bought had no prior toehold, so a missing stake says little either way.

    Weight 25%
  • Distance to a producing mine
    Sub-score: Not yet researched

    Distance not yet researched: no project coordinates on file

    Distance can't be measured without coordinates, so excluded rather than counted as far.

    Weight 22.5%
  • Lifecycle stage
    Sub-score:
    1/10

    Stage: Grassroots Exploration

    Feasibility and permitting score 10, where deals cluster, and production 5.5; earlier stages score less, down to 1 at grassroots.

    Weight 15% · 57% here
  • Jurisdiction
    Sub-score:
    9/10

    Canada: jurisdiction score 9/10

    Our jurisdiction score, used as is: higher means lower political and permitting risk.

    Weight 6.75% · 26% here
  • Commodity
    Sub-score:
    4/10

    Primary commodity: Uranium

    Gold 10, copper 8, silver 5, nickel and uranium 4, others 2: most majors' deals are for gold.

    Weight 4.5% · 17% here

Weight is each input's share of the full score. “Here” is its share of this company's score: inputs that aren't scored are left out and the rest re-weighted, never counted as zero.

Overall Score Trend
-35.2% since 2026-09-17 · -35.2% from peak

Your Rankings

Community Sentiment
—SELLINGBUYING
CategoryCommunityYour Ranking
Overall— (0) 
Management— (0) 
Financials— (0) 
Jurisdiction— (0) 
Project Quality— (0) 

Management Team

Chief Financial Officer of Saga Metals Corp. (TSXV: SAGA). CPA with over 9 years of finance experience under IFRS, spanning financial planning, analysis and reporting across mining, technology, real estate and life sciences. Source: sagametals.com.

Independent Director of Saga Metals Corp. (TSXV: SAGA) since 2024; also Chief Financial Officer of Barksdale Resources Corp. CPA, CGA with 25+ years of professional accounting and business-consultancy experience; currently an independent board member of U.S. Gold Corp. (NASDAQ: USAU). Founder of Michael Waldkirch & Co., Inc. (1998).

VP Exploration at Scorpio Gold Corporation; also a director of Saga Metals Corp. Geologist, 8 years across Canada, Nevada, Uzbekistan, Finland, Japan, Mali; prior work with B2Gold.

Chief Executive Officer and Director of Saga Metals Corp. (TSXV: SAGA), appointed January 2023. Prior roles include CEO & Director of New Leaf Ventures, Inc. (2018-2023), Director at Spark Energy Minerals, Inc., and director roles at Rektron Group and LaFleur Minerals. Bachelor's degree in Business Administration and Management, Kwantlen Polytechnic University. Source: sagametals.com; simplywall.st/Crunchbase Michael Stier profile.

Chief Geological Officer and Director of Saga Metals Corp. (TSXV: SAGA). B.Sc. in Geology; ~20 years of international exploration experience across North and South America, Africa and Asia, spanning gold, base metals, uranium and lithium pegmatites. Previously worked alongside Al Miller in 2019 on Nighthawk Gold Corp's Colomac project (Northwest Territories). Source: sagametals.com; Junior Mining Network Saga Metals coverage.

Insiders, Investors & Smart Money

Notable shareholders and insiders whose involvement is worth knowing about, plus what we're seeing from institutional/large-investor activity.

Smart money

No smart-money tracking (institutional/large-investor activity) for this miner yet — this is a planned feature, not live data.

No notable insiders tracked for this miner yet.

Reports, Presentations & Documents

Technical Report Takeaways

Saga Metals, renamed from Saga Lithium in January 2024, owns 100% of the Double Mer uranium project in Labrador, 1,024 claims covering 25,600 hectares about 90km north-east of Happy Valley-Goose Bay near the Central Mineral Belt. Double Mer is an IOCG- and pegmatite-style uranium system with an 18km east-west mineralised trend across the Luivik, Nanuk and Katjuk zones, where grab samples have returned up to 0.428% U3O8. The company also holds the 24,175-hectare Radar titanium-vanadium-iron project, a layered mafic intrusion hosting vanadiferous titanomagnetite and ilmenite, where 10,353m has been drilled to date. No resource has been estimated for either project.

Recent News

Critical MineralsGeologyMineral Resource EstimateMining