JUNIORMETRICS

Resolution Minerals Ltd

RML·RML·US$0.022 (AUD 0.031)·US$49.6M cap
GoldHorse Heaven Gold-Antimony-Tungsten Project, Valley County, Idaho Map

Resolution Minerals (renamed from Northern Cobalt Limited, November 2019) is advancing the Horse Heaven Gold-Antimony-Tungsten Project in Valley County, Idaho. Gold is co-primary with disclosed antimony and tungsten mineralisation, so the project is multi-commodity. Cash of AUD $15.2 million (mid-2026) is reconciled from a A$20 million April 2026 placement against a stale A$1.17 million Q4-2025 figure, net of subsequent cash burn already factored in; the company is debt-free, confirmed across two sources. Share price is given as a AUD $0.044-0.05 range; the lower end is used here.

Notable vs. Peers

  • Trading within 1% of its 52-week low — weak recent price momentum.

Lifecycle Milestones

Grassroots
Resource Def.Current
PEA
PFS
Feasibility
Permitting
Construction
Production
5.1/10
Weak track recordStrong track record
5.1/10 vs.
4.1/10
Thin runwayWell-capitalized
4.1/10 vs.
How this is calculated
Not yet researched
Weaker depositStronger deposit
How this is calculated
6.6/10
Harder place to buildEasier place to build
6.6/10 vs.
What goes into it
  • Jurisdiction (40%)9/10

    Idaho: Fraser PPI 2025 is 77.16 of 100 (rank 27 of 68), which maps to 9 on this site's scale. Valley County, Idaho, USA (Horse Heaven gold-antimony-tungsten project) is a top-tier US mining jurisdiction, scored 9 like most Idaho companies on this site.

  • Infrastructure (40%)No verified figure

    Researched with nothing found: no source we could cite confirms or rules out an existing mill, road access, grid power, or tailings facility at Horse Heaven Gold-Antimony-Tungsten Project, Valley County, Idaho (checked Oct 1, 2026; recheck due Mar 30, 2027). Counts at a neutral 5/10 until one does.

  • Nearby producing mine (20%)Not yet researched

    No project coordinates on file yet, so distance to a producing mine can't be measured.

5.2/10
Weaker profileStronger profile
5.2/10 vs.
Price Chart
$0.041$0.039$0.035$0.031$0.022AugDecAprJulOct
Aug 12, 2025 – Oct 20, 2026
News
$0.022
+3.3%from low-79.2%from high
$0.021$0.10
See who ↓
13.8%
Low alignmentHigh alignment
13.8% vs.
See who ↓
0%
Low alignmentHigh alignment
0% vs.
$49.6M
Far belowFar above
$49.6M vs. $21.9M peer median
Price (USD - Local)
US$0.022 (AUD 0.031)
Cash Position (USD)
$7.2M
Far belowFar above
$7.2M vs. $3.3M peer median
Debt (USD)
Far aboveFar below
$0 vs. $0 peer median
$42.4M
Far belowFar above
$42.4M vs. $19.4M peer median
2.3B
Far aboveFar below
2.3B vs. 153.6M peer median
Jurisdiction
United States
13.8%
0%100%
13.8% vs. 12.1% peer median
0%
0%100%
0% vs. 3.3% peer median
-$19.7M
Far belowFar above
-$19.7M vs. -$3.3M peer median
-$0.009
Far belowFar above
-$0.009 vs. -$0.018 peer median

Acquisition Susceptibility

How this is calculated
6/10
Unlikely bolt-onFits the takeout profile

A relative ranking of how closely this company matches the profile of juniors that have actually been acquired — not a probability, and not a reason to buy. Acquisitions are rare: only a few dozen significant deals happen a year across a universe of thousands of juniors, so even a high score here describes a long shot. The strongest signal in the research, a producer that already owns part of the company, is scored from its disclosed strategic shareholders. A producer that is a joint-venture or earn-in partner on the project, rather than a shareholder, isn't captured yet.

How this score is built

  • Disclosed pending deal
    Sub-score: Not scored

    No pending acquisition or merger disclosed (checked)

    Not scored: having no deal in flight isn't held against a company.

    Weight 26.25%
  • Producer's strategic stake
    Sub-score: Not scored

    No producer holds a disclosed stake on file (holder register researched) See holders

    Not scored: most juniors that do get bought had no prior toehold, so a missing stake says little either way.

    Weight 25%
  • Distance to a producing mine
    Sub-score: Not yet researched

    Distance not yet researched: no project coordinates on file

    Distance can't be measured without coordinates, so excluded rather than counted as far.

    Weight 22.5%
  • Lifecycle stage
    Sub-score:
    3.5/10

    Stage: Resource Definition

    Feasibility and permitting score 10, where deals cluster, and production 5.5; earlier stages score less, down to 1 at grassroots.

    Weight 15% · 57% here
  • Jurisdiction
    Sub-score:
    9/10

    United States: jurisdiction score 9/10

    Our jurisdiction score, used as is: higher means lower political and permitting risk.

    Weight 6.75% · 26% here
  • Commodity
    Sub-score:
    10/10

    Primary commodity: Gold

    Gold 10, copper 8, silver 5, nickel and uranium 4, others 2: most majors' deals are for gold.

    Weight 4.5% · 17% here

Weight is each input's share of the full score. “Here” is its share of this company's score: inputs that aren't scored are left out and the rest re-weighted, never counted as zero.

Overall Score Trend
-29.7% since 2026-08-01 · -37.3% from peak

Your Rankings

Community Sentiment
—SELLINGBUYING
CategoryCommunityYour Ranking
Overall— (0) 
Management— (0) 
Financials— (0) 
Jurisdiction— (0) 
Project Quality— (0) 

Management Team

Executive Director of Resolution Minerals Ltd. Lawyer with expertise in corporate law, M&A, and business negotiations, including tenement/landowner negotiations.

Executive Director of Resolution Minerals Ltd. New York-based businessman contributing business acumen.

CEO, US Operations of Resolution Minerals Ltd.; also Chairman & Director of Electric Royalties Ltd and a director of VR Resources Ltd. 30+ years in M&A and corporate development; led four companies from inception to sale, including developing Otis Gold Corp.

CFO and Company Secretary of Resolution Minerals Ltd. 25+ years in financial and secretarial roles in the mining sector.

Technical Lead at Resolution Minerals Ltd. 40+ years in senior leadership developing exploration strategies; Qualified Person under Canadian and Australian standards.

Lead Consulting Geologist at Resolution Minerals Ltd.; also Geologist & Head of Investor Relations of Stallion Uranium Corp. 15+ years in geology, development and environmental science; prior experience at Perpetua's Stibnite Project.

Chief Metallurgist of Resolution Minerals Ltd. PhD in Antimony Geochemistry; 10+ years in process development and extraction.

Insiders, Investors & Smart Money

Notable shareholders and insiders whose involvement is worth knowing about, plus what we're seeing from institutional/large-investor activity.

Smart money
1/10

Real institutional money has come in, but none of it is disclosed at a size that says much. Tribeca Investment Partners and L1 Capital cornerstoned a roughly A$20M placement in April 2026, and an earlier A$25.1M raise in late 2025 was backed by John Hancock's family office, Astrotricha Capital and the S3 Consortium, together putting in A$7.75M. No producer holds equity, no substantial-holder notice names a resource specialist, and there are no institutional or insider records in our data. Horse Heaven's appeal is a US critical-minerals permitting story rather than a shareholder-register one.

No notable insiders tracked for this miner yet.

Reports, Presentations & Documents

Technical Report Takeaways

Resolution Minerals, renamed from Northern Cobalt in November 2019, is advancing the Horse Heaven gold-antimony-tungsten project in Valley County, Idaho, where gold is co-primary with antimony and tungsten. Horse Heaven has only historical gold estimates that are not JORC-compliant, 216,000 oz at Golden Gate Hill and 70,000 oz at Antimony Hill, and a 30,000-foot drill program in 2026 is aimed at a maiden compliant resource by the end of 2026. The project has received two FAST-41 transparency designations for federal permitting coordination, for the Antimony Ridge target in April 2026 and, in July 2026, for the Golden Gate tungsten-gold target, which hosts the past-producing Golden Gate tungsten mine.