JUNIORMETRICS

PTR Minerals LimitedP

PTR·US$0.056 (AUD 0.08)·US$22.2M cap
Multi-Metalalso:Rosewood Titanium Project (Muckanippie), northern Gawler Craton, South Australia Map

PTR Minerals Limited (renamed from Petratherm Limited effective 11 Nov 2025, ticker unchanged) is a titanium-focused heavy-mineral-sands developer on the northern Gawler Craton in South Australia. The old Petratherm geothermal business (Paralana) was shelved in 2014 and its Tasmanian petroleum licence relinquished; the Nov 2025 rename reflects a mineral-exploration-only focus with no legacy geothermal carried forward. The flagship Rosewood Titanium Project is split between wholly-owned Rosewood East and the Rosewood West joint venture (PTR 70% / Narryer Metals 30%). A maiden JORC Mineral Resource (23 June 2026) reported 463 million tonnes at 8.8% heavy minerals for 40.6 million tonnes of contained heavy minerals (100%-project basis; 57% Indicated/43% Inferred at a 3% HM cutoff), comprising very high-grade Rosewood East (294Mt @ 9.7% HM, 28.5Mt contained HM, 89% Indicated) plus Rosewood West (169Mt @ 7.1% HM, Inferred, on the JV partner's own reported figure). The heavy-mineral assemblage is leucoxene-dominant (approximately 75% of the HM fraction) with rutile as a further product; a 66.7% TiO2 figure found in some coverage is a metallurgical-test PRODUCT grade, not an in-situ resource grade. The company also holds early-stage IOCG copper-gold and rare-earth/gold exploration projects elsewhere in its South Australian portfolio. No completed economic study exists yet -- pit-optimisation and scoping work (with Australian Mining Consultants) is in progress. The company held approximately A$13.6 million in cash at 30 June 2026 with a debt-free balance sheet.

Notable vs. Peers

  • Financials score of 8.4/10 is stronger than the peer average of 4.9/10.
  • Trading within 3% of its 52-week low — weak recent price momentum.

Lifecycle Milestones

Grassroots
Resource Def.Current
PEA
PFS
Feasibility
Permitting
Construction
Production
8.4/10
Weak track recordStrong track record
8.4/10 vs.
8.4/10
Thin runwayWell-capitalized
8.4/10 vs.
How this is calculated
Not scored (no size scale for mineral sands)
26,635,000 t heavy mineral on file
Weaker depositStronger deposit
How this is calculated
6.6/10
Harder place to buildEasier place to build
6.6/10 vs.
What goes into it
  • Jurisdiction (40%)9/10

    South Australia: Fraser PPI 2025 is 85.47 of 100 (rank 16 of 68), which maps to 9 on this site's scale. South Australia (northern Gawler Craton) -- top-tier, low political-risk mining jurisdiction, matching this schema's established Australian-state convention.

  • Infrastructure (40%)No verified figure

    Researched with nothing found: no source we could cite confirms or rules out an existing mill, road access, grid power, or tailings facility at Rosewood Titanium Project (Muckanippie), Northern Gawler Craton, South Australia (checked Sep 26, 2026; recheck due Mar 25, 2027). Counts at a neutral 5/10 until one does.

  • Nearby producing mine (20%)Not yet researched

    No project coordinates on file yet, so distance to a producing mine can't be measured.

7.1/10
Weaker profileStronger profile
7.1/10 vs.
Price Chart
$0.237$0.194$0.083$0.06$0.057AugDecAprJulOct
Aug 27, 2025 – Oct 20, 2026
$0.056
+9.5%from low-76.2%from high
$0.051$0.24
$22.2M
Far belowFar above
$22.2M vs. $15.6M peer median
Price (USD - Local)
US$0.056 (AUD 0.08)
Cash Position (USD)
$9.4M
Far belowFar above
$9.4M vs. $1.7M peer median
Debt (USD)
Far aboveFar below
$0 vs. $0 peer median
$12.8M
Far belowFar above
$12.8M vs. $12.5M peer median
395.3M
Far aboveFar below
395.3M vs. 232M peer median
Jurisdiction
Australia
26,635,000 t heavy mineral
Feeds Deposit Quality score
Indicated26,635,000 t heavy mineral
Inferrednot scored10,300,000 t heavy mineral
Total resource36,935,000 t heavy mineral
Not enough peer companies report this metric
Compares M&I only — Inferred isn't compared or scored.
$0.48/t
M&I
Total resource (incl. Inferred)$0.346/t
Not enough peer companies report this metric
All-In Sustaining Cost
-$4.2M
Far belowFar above
-$4.2M vs. -$2.9M peer median
-$0.011
Far belowFar above
-$0.011 vs. -$0.011 peer median

Acquisition Susceptibility

How this is calculated
4.7/10
Unlikely bolt-onFits the takeout profile

A relative ranking of how closely this company matches the profile of juniors that have actually been acquired — not a probability, and not a reason to buy. Acquisitions are rare: only a few dozen significant deals happen a year across a universe of thousands of juniors, so even a high score here describes a long shot. The strongest signal in the research, a producer that already owns part of the company, is scored from its disclosed strategic shareholders. A producer that is a joint-venture or earn-in partner on the project, rather than a shareholder, isn't captured yet.

How this score is built

  • Disclosed pending deal
    Sub-score: Not scored

    No pending acquisition or merger disclosed (checked)

    Not scored: having no deal in flight isn't held against a company.

    Weight 26.25%
  • Producer's strategic stake
    Sub-score: Not scored

    No producer holds a disclosed stake on file (holder register researched) See holders

    Not scored: most juniors that do get bought had no prior toehold, so a missing stake says little either way.

    Weight 25%
  • Distance to a producing mine
    Sub-score: Not yet researched

    Distance not yet researched: no project coordinates on file

    Distance can't be measured without coordinates, so excluded rather than counted as far.

    Weight 22.5%
  • Lifecycle stage
    Sub-score:
    3.5/10

    Stage: Resource Definition

    Feasibility and permitting score 10, where deals cluster, and production 5.5; earlier stages score less, down to 1 at grassroots.

    Weight 15% · 57% here
  • Jurisdiction
    Sub-score:
    9/10

    Australia: jurisdiction score 9/10

    Our jurisdiction score, used as is: higher means lower political and permitting risk.

    Weight 6.75% · 26% here
  • Commodity
    Sub-score:
    2/10

    Primary commodity: Other

    Gold 10, copper 8, silver 5, nickel and uranium 4, others 2: most majors' deals are for gold.

    Weight 4.5% · 17% here

Weight is each input's share of the full score. “Here” is its share of this company's score: inputs that aren't scored are left out and the rest re-weighted, never counted as zero.

Overall Score Trend
-25.3% since 2026-08-27 · -25.3% from peak

Your Rankings

Community Sentiment
—SELLINGBUYING
CategoryCommunityYour Ranking
Overall— (0) 
Management— (0) 
Financials— (0) 
Jurisdiction— (0) 
Project Quality— (0) 

Management Team

Over 30 years' experience in mineral exploration. Founding CEO of PTR Minerals following its 2004 ASX listing and part of the original Minotaur Resources team that discovered the Prominent Hill copper-gold deposit.

Independent Non-Executive Chair of Kantra Copper Limited (formerly Hillgrove Resources Limited), appointed 2020-04-24; also Non-Executive Chairman of PTR Minerals Limited.

Over 25 years' experience as an investment banker with JP Morgan, Macquarie Capital, and RBC Capital Markets. Previously led Mineral Deposits Limited and served as Managing Director of Alicanto Minerals Limited.

Former Base Resources Executive Director; appointed to PTR Minerals' board August 2026 as the Company advances the Rosewood Titanium Project.

Corporate governance and company-secretarial professional supporting PTR Minerals' ASX compliance and investor reporting.

Insiders, Investors & Smart Money

Notable shareholders and insiders whose involvement is worth knowing about, plus what we're seeing from institutional/large-investor activity.

Smart money

No smart-money tracking (institutional/large-investor activity) for this miner yet — this is a planned feature, not live data.

No notable insiders tracked for this miner yet.

Reports, Presentations & Documents

Technical Report Takeaways

PTR Minerals, renamed from Petratherm on 11 November 2025, is a titanium-focused mineral sands developer on South Australia's northern Gawler Craton, where its Rosewood titanium project combines the wholly owned Rosewood East and the Rosewood West joint venture, held 70% by PTR and 30% by Narryer Metals. The maiden JORC resource of 23 June 2026 is 463 Mt at 8.8% heavy minerals for 40.6 Mt of contained heavy minerals on a 100% basis, 57% indicated and 43% inferred, led by the high-grade Rosewood East at 294 Mt at 9.7% heavy minerals, and the heavy-mineral assemblage is about 75% leucoxene, with rutile as a further product. Metallurgical test work has produced a concentrate grading 90.8% heavy minerals at 91.3% recovery, with titanium product streams of 55.4% to 84.2% TiO2, and the company says its scoping study workstreams are substantially complete and it has begun talks with potential customers. It held about A$13.6M in cash at 30 June 2026 and has no debt.