JUNIORMETRICS

Osisko Gold Group Inc.

OGG·OGG·US$2.57 (CAD 3.62)·US$784.5M cap
GoldMulti-asset portfolio (Cariboo Gold Project flagship, British Columbia; Tintic Project / Trixie test mine, Utah) Map

Osisko Gold Group (renamed from Osisko Development Corp. effective July 2026, new ticker OGG) is constructing the underground Cariboo Gold Project in BC's historic Cariboo mining district and also holds the Tintic past-producing district project in Utah, from which it already generates small-scale gold revenue. The April 2025 Optimized Feasibility Study estimates Probable mineral reserves of 17.8 Mt grading 3.62 g/t Au for 2.07 Moz of contained gold (effective April 10, 2025).

Notable vs. Peers

  • Financials score of 10/10 is stronger than the peer average of 6.5/10.
  • All-in sustaining cost of $1,163/oz is 36% lower than the peer producer average of $1,814/oz.

Lifecycle Milestones

Grassroots
Resource Def.
PEA
PFS
Feasibility
Permitting
ConstructionCurrent
Production

Construction Milestones

2 of 5 reached
  1. Dec 2024 · Source
  2. Sep 2026 · Source
  3. Not yet reached
  4. Not yet reached
    Expected Q1 2029 · First gold pour guided Q1 2029, commercial production H2 2029, per the 14 Sep 2026 formal construction-decision announcement. · Source
  5. Not yet reached

Milestones are recorded only from a company's own dated disclosure. A milestone with no date shown is one we can confirm was reached but for which no date was disclosed — we don't estimate one. "Not yet reached" means exactly that, not that a date is missing. An "Expected" line likewise only ever reflects the company's own guidance (e.g. a study or permit decision targeted for a stated quarter) — most not-yet-reached milestones have none, and that absence means no such guidance has been disclosed, not that one is overdue.

Prior Ownership & Infrastructure
Cariboo Gold Project, British Columbia, Canada
Existing MillTailings FacilityRoad Access3 of 4 checked, 3 in place

Not yet determined: grid power.

Combined view across 2 projects. Figures below are only combined where the underlying basis genuinely matches -- see the notes under each.

Combined resource
3.8M oz Au
Sum of 2 of 2 projects with a disclosed figure
IRR, per project
  • 34.7%Cariboo Gold Project, British Columbia, Canada
Each project's own figure -- IRR is not additive across independent projects, so these are never combined
Mine life, per project
  • 10 yrsCariboo Gold Project, British Columbia, Canada
Each project's own figure -- independent mine lives are never added or averaged
Combined NPV, by discount-rate basis
$1.7B
At 5% discount rate -- Cariboo Gold Project, British Columbia, Canada
5.4/10
Weak track recordStrong track record
5.4/10 vs.
10/10
Thin runwayWell-capitalized
10/10 vs.
How this is calculated
6.2/10
Weaker depositStronger deposit
6.2/10 vs.
How this is calculated
8/10
Harder place to buildEasier place to build
8/10 vs.
What goes into it
  • Jurisdiction (40%)9/10

    British Columbia: Fraser PPI 2025 is 74.28 of 100 (rank 31 of 68), which maps to 9 on this site's scale. British Columbia, Canada (primary asset) with a secondary Utah, USA asset — both top-tier, low political-risk mining jurisdictions.

  • Infrastructure (40%)8.6/10

    A confirmed mill, confirmed road access, and a confirmed tailings facility at Cariboo Gold Project, British Columbia, Canada; grid power not yet researched, counted at a neutral 5/10 until established.

  • Nearby producing mine (20%)Not yet researched

    No producing mine within 50 km in our reference list (nearest listed: Mount Polley (Imperial Metals Corporation), 62 km). That list doesn't cover every mining district yet, so a longer distance isn't scored as remote.

7.4/10
Weaker profileStronger profile
7.4/10 vs.
Price Chart
$2.29$3.25$2.76$2.26$2.58JulNovMarJulOct
Jul 25, 2025 – Oct 20, 2026
Stage changeNews
$2.57
+18.6%from low-45.1%from high
$2.17$4.69
See who ↓
0.6%
Low alignmentHigh alignment
0.6% vs.
See who ↓
39.2%
Low alignmentHigh alignment
39.2% vs.
$784.5M
Far belowFar above
$784.5M vs. $541.2M peer median
Price (USD - Local)
US$2.57 (CAD 3.62)
Cash Position (USD)
$589.8M
Far belowFar above
$589.8M vs. $91.1M peer median
Debt (USD)
$319.5M
Far aboveFar below
$319.5M vs. $6.2M peer median
$514.2M
Far belowFar above
$514.2M vs. $457.8M peer median
304.7M
Far aboveFar below
304.7M vs. 336.8M peer median
Jurisdiction
Canada
3,832,798 oz
Feeds Deposit Quality score
Measured + Indicated3,832,798 oz
Inferrednot scored1,915,000 oz
Total resource5,747,798 oz
Far belowFar above
3.8M oz vs. 1.3M oz peer median
Compares M&I only — Inferred isn't compared or scored.
$134.16/oz
M&I
Total resource (incl. Inferred)$89.46/oz
Peer median $67.95/oz
Far aboveFar below
$134.16/oz vs. $132.92/oz peer median
0.0981 oz/tCut-off: 1.8 g/t Au (underground cut-off, Cow/Valley/Shaft/Mosquito/BC Vein/KL/Lowhee deposits); 3.5 g/t Au (underground cut-off, Bonanza Ledge)
Far belowFar above
0.0981 oz/t vs. 0.0379 oz/t peer median
Underground
10 yrs2026 study
Far belowFar above
10 yrs vs. 11.1 yrs peer median
$1,163/oz2026 study
@5%$1.7B2026 study · gold deck US$3,570 vs spot US$4,133/oz
Far belowFar above
$1.7B vs. $602M peer median
0.47x2026 study · gold deck US$3,570 vs spot US$4,133/oz
Far aboveFar below
0.47x vs. 0.32x peer median
0.31x2026 study · gold deck US$3,570 vs spot US$4,133/oz
Far aboveFar below
0.31x vs. 0.29x peer median
$717M2026 study
Far aboveFar below
$717M vs. $276.5M peer median
2.3xClears Durrett's 2:1 bar2026 study · gold deck US$3,570 vs spot US$4,133/oz
Far belowFar above
2.3x vs. 2.4x peer median
$3,570/oz14% below spot ($4,133/oz)2026 study
35%Clears Durrett's 25% developer bar2026 study · gold deck US$3,570 vs spot US$4,133/oz
Far belowFar above
35% vs. 43% peer median
0.6%
0%100%
0.6% vs. 12.1% peer median
39.2%
0%100%
39.2% vs. 3.3% peer median
62 kmfrom Imperial Metals Corporation's Mount Polley
Outside typical bolt-on range

Acquisition Susceptibility

How this is calculated
6.4/10
Unlikely bolt-onFits the takeout profile

A relative ranking of how closely this company matches the profile of juniors that have actually been acquired — not a probability, and not a reason to buy. Acquisitions are rare: only a few dozen significant deals happen a year across a universe of thousands of juniors, so even a high score here describes a long shot. The strongest signal in the research, a producer that already owns part of the company, is scored from its disclosed strategic shareholders. A producer that is a joint-venture or earn-in partner on the project, rather than a shareholder, isn't captured yet.

How this score is built

  • Disclosed pending deal
    Sub-score: Not scored

    No pending acquisition or merger disclosed (checked)

    Not scored: having no deal in flight isn't held against a company.

    Weight 26.25%
  • Producer's strategic stake
    Sub-score: Not scored

    No producer holds a disclosed stake on file (holder register researched) See holders

    Not scored: most juniors that do get bought had no prior toehold, so a missing stake says little either way.

    Weight 25%
  • Distance to a producing mine
    Sub-score:
    4.6/10

    Nearest producing mine: Mount Polley (Imperial Metals Corporation), 62 km

    10 next to a producing mine, 8 at 20 km, 5 at 50 km, 0 beyond 200 km.

    Weight 22.5% · 46% here
  • Lifecycle stage
    Sub-score:
    7/10

    Stage: Construction

    Feasibility and permitting score 10, where deals cluster, and production 5.5; earlier stages score less, down to 1 at grassroots.

    Weight 15% · 31% here
  • Jurisdiction
    Sub-score:
    9/10

    Canada: jurisdiction score 9/10

    Our jurisdiction score, used as is: higher means lower political and permitting risk.

    Weight 6.75% · 14% here
  • Commodity
    Sub-score:
    10/10

    Primary commodity: Gold

    Gold 10, copper 8, silver 5, nickel and uranium 4, others 2: most majors' deals are for gold.

    Weight 4.5% · 9% here

Weight is each input's share of the full score. “Here” is its share of this company's score: inputs that aren't scored are left out and the rest re-weighted, never counted as zero.

Overall Score Trend
-23.7% since 2026-07-23 · -23.7% from peak

Your Rankings

Community Sentiment
100SELLINGBUYING
CategoryCommunityYour Ranking
Overall10/10 (1) 
Management— (0) 
Financials— (0) 
Jurisdiction— (0) 
Project Quality— (0) 

Management Team

Founding member of Osisko Mining Corporation in 2003, a graduate of the Haileybury School of Mines, and served as its President, CEO and Director from 2010 to 2014, leading the discovery, financing and development of the Canadian Malartic mine and its eventual sale. Founded and led Osisko Gold Royalties as Executive Chairman/CEO from its 2014 inception until 2023, then founded Osisko Development Corp. in 2020, serving as Chairman & CEO since. Named among the "Top 20 Most Influential Individuals in Global Mining" and received a Mines and Money Americas award for Best CEO in North America in 2017.

Insiders, Investors & Smart Money

Notable shareholders and insiders whose involvement is worth knowing about, plus what we're seeing from institutional/large-investor activity.

Smart money
6/10

Double Zero Capital, a US investment firm, put roughly US$75M of cash in through a private placement that closed on 15 August 2025 and now holds 48,591,775 shares, 15.95% of the company (19.9% beneficially with the warrants its blocker allows, per its own SEC Schedule 13D/A of 26 May 2026), with warrants and a top-up right that let it go to a hard cap of 19.9%, plus the right to name a director. It has kept adding since -- another 2.4 million shares bought at US$4.78 in October 2025. On the day that placement closed, ten of the company's own directors and officers subscribed alongside it at US$2.05, including chairman Sean Roosen with 488,000 shares, and nobody at the company has sold a share. Condire Management, a resources-focused fund, holds a further 8.2%, and the register carries an unusually long tail of small dedicated gold funds -- Franklin, VanEck, Schroder, CPR, Konwave, Gabelli, Ruffer and others.

No notable insiders tracked for this miner yet.

Reports, Presentations & Documents

Technical Report Takeaways

Osisko Gold Group, renamed from Osisko Development in July 2026, is building the 100%-owned underground Cariboo Gold Project in British Columbia's historic Cariboo mining district and also owns the Tintic project in Utah, where test mining at the Trixie deposit generates small-scale gold revenue. Its resource totals 3,832,798 oz of gold, combining Cariboo's 2,070,798 oz probable reserve (17.8 Mt at 3.62 g/t), Cariboo's additional measured and indicated resources reported exclusive of reserves, and 150,000 oz at Trixie, plus 1,915,000 oz inferred. The board made a formal construction decision on 14 September 2026, with the project already 22% physically complete, go-forward capital of US$717M (CAD 990M) funded by C$837M of cash and a US$450M Appian facility, and first gold guided for Q1 2029. The August 2026 go-forward update shows an after-tax NPV5% of US$1.68B and a 34.7% IRR at a long-term consensus gold price of US$3,570/oz, with a 10-year mine life averaging about 190,000 oz a year and an all-in sustaining cost of US$1,163/oz.