JUNIORMETRICS

Shell Company

This company currently holds no active mineral project.

NuLegacy Gold Corporation

NULGF·NUG·US$0.16 (CAD 0.23)·US$512.1K cap
GoldNone -- Red Hill (Eureka County, Nevada) fully reverted to underlying owner, Apr 2025; no active mineral project Map

NuLegacy Gold Corporation (TSXV:NUG, OTC:NULGF) is a shell-stage company with no currently disclosed mineral project. It formerly explored the Red Hill gold property in Eureka County, Nevada, on trend with and adjacent to the multi-million-ounce Pipeline, Cortez Hills and Goldrush Carlin-type deposits, and had identified a large mineralized-system target (Rift Anticline) there. The company suspended further exploration in early 2024 after the 2023 drill season failed to return economic-grade intercepts, citing funding constraints. On 7 April 2025 the company announced -- in its own words -- that it 'will be reverting its responsibility for the Red Hill property/s located in the state of Nevada back to its underlying owners as per the properties governing agreements,' meaning NuLegacy no longer holds any interest in Red Hill (this supersedes an earlier, narrower Nov 2024 disclosure describing only a partial, eastern-half reversion; the Apr 2025 release reverted the property in full, unqualified by half). Since then the company's news flow has consisted solely of board/officer changes (CEO has turned over twice, most recently to Ari Chaney as of 15 Jul 2026) and a 25:1 share consolidation -- no replacement project, financing-for-drilling plan, or exploration budget has been announced. The Company's own 2026 AGM Information Circular (dated as at 29 Jun 2026, covering FY2025-FY2026) makes no mention of Red Hill or any mineral property anywhere in its 27 pages, and its ~$15-17K/yr audit fees and non-technical director slate (capital markets/HR/consulting backgrounds) are consistent with a dormant/reorganizing shell rather than an active explorer. No NI 43-101 mineral resource estimate was ever published for Red Hill. The company is listed but currently has no disclosed mineral asset.

Lifecycle Milestones

GrassrootsCurrent
Resource Def.
PEA
PFS
Feasibility
Permitting
Construction
Production
Not yet researched
Weak track recordStrong track record
Not yet researched
Thin runwayWell-capitalized
How this is calculated
Not yet researched
Weaker depositStronger deposit
How this is calculated
6.6/10
Harder place to buildEasier place to build
6.6/10 vs.
What goes into it
  • Jurisdiction (40%)9/10

    Score reflects the company's US domicile/historical Nevada focus (a Tier-1 mining jurisdiction), not a currently-held asset -- NuLegacy holds no mineral property anywhere at present. The former Red Hill property (Eureka County, Nevada, on trend with the Pipeline, Cortez Hills and Goldrush Carlin-type deposits) was fully reverted to its underlying owner in Apr 2025; no replacement project has been disclosed as of the 2026 AGM Information Circular (29 Jun 2026).

  • Infrastructure (40%)Not yet researched

    No flagship project on file yet, so existing mill, road access, grid power, and tailings facility haven't been researched.

  • Nearby producing mine (20%)Not yet researched

    No project coordinates on file yet, so distance to a producing mine can't be measured.

Not yet researched
Weaker profileStronger profile
Price Chart
$0.359$0.273$0.309$0.237$0.164AugDecMarJulOct19
Aug 12, 2025 – Oct 20, 2026
News
$0.16
+366.4%from low-53.4%from high
$0.035$0.35
$512.1K
Far belowFar above
$512.1K vs. $22.1M peer median
Price (USD - Local)
US$0.16 (CAD 0.23)
Cash Position (USD)
Debt (USD)
$0
Far aboveFar below
$0 vs. $0 peer median
$512.1KEstimated: no verified cash figure (counted as $0)
Far belowFar above
$512.1K vs. $19.4M peer median
3.1M
Far aboveFar below
3.1M vs. 154.2M peer median
Jurisdiction
United States
No active mineral project. The former Red Hill exploration property (Eureka County, Nevada) was fully reverted to its underlying owner in Apr 2025 (not merely paused/suspended); no replacement project has been disclosed as of the company's 2026 AGM Information Circular (29 Jun 2026).
0%
0%100%
0% vs. 12.1% peer median

Acquisition Susceptibility

How this is calculated
4.6/10
Unlikely bolt-onFits the takeout profile

A relative ranking of how closely this company matches the profile of juniors that have actually been acquired — not a probability, and not a reason to buy. Acquisitions are rare: only a few dozen significant deals happen a year across a universe of thousands of juniors, so even a high score here describes a long shot. The strongest signal in the research, a producer that already owns part of the company, is scored from its disclosed strategic shareholders. A producer that is a joint-venture or earn-in partner on the project, rather than a shareholder, isn't captured yet.

How this score is built

  • Disclosed pending deal
    Sub-score: Not scored

    No pending acquisition or merger disclosed (checked)

    Not scored: having no deal in flight isn't held against a company.

    Weight 26.25%
  • Producer's strategic stake
    Sub-score: Not scored

    No producer holds a disclosed stake on file (holder register researched) See holders

    Not scored: most juniors that do get bought had no prior toehold, so a missing stake says little either way.

    Weight 25%
  • Distance to a producing mine
    Sub-score: Not yet researched

    Distance not yet researched: no project coordinates on file

    Distance can't be measured without coordinates, so excluded rather than counted as far.

    Weight 22.5%
  • Lifecycle stage
    Sub-score:
    1/10

    Stage: Grassroots Exploration

    Feasibility and permitting score 10, where deals cluster, and production 5.5; earlier stages score less, down to 1 at grassroots.

    Weight 15% · 57% here
  • Jurisdiction
    Sub-score:
    9/10

    United States: jurisdiction score 9/10

    Our jurisdiction score, used as is: higher means lower political and permitting risk.

    Weight 6.75% · 26% here
  • Commodity
    Sub-score:
    10/10

    Primary commodity: Gold

    Gold 10, copper 8, silver 5, nickel and uranium 4, others 2: most majors' deals are for gold.

    Weight 4.5% · 17% here

Weight is each input's share of the full score. “Here” is its share of this company's score: inputs that aren't scored are left out and the rest re-weighted, never counted as zero.

Overall Score Trend

Trend data collecting — check back after a few more refreshes.

Your Rankings

Community Sentiment
—SELLINGBUYING
CategoryCommunityYour Ranking
Overall— (0) 
Management— (0) 
Financials— (0) 
Jurisdiction— (0) 
Project Quality— (0) 

Management Team

Chief Executive Officer and Director of NuLegacy Gold Corporation, taking the CEO role in April 2025, succeeding Albert Matter, who stepped down as CEO and later resigned entirely from the board in September 2025.

Chief Financial Officer and Director of NuLegacy Gold Corporation.

Director of NuLegacy Gold Corporation, appointed to the board effective July 15, 2026.

Director and Corporate Secretary of NuLegacy Gold Corporation, appointed to the board effective July 15, 2026.

Insiders, Investors & Smart Money

Notable shareholders and insiders whose involvement is worth knowing about, plus what we're seeing from institutional/large-investor activity.

Smart money
1/10

No producer, strategic investor, or resource-specialist fund holds a disclosed stake, and no insider trading activity has been filed in the last six months. The company has struggled to finance operations after not finding economic gold grades at its main property.

No notable insiders tracked for this miner yet.

Reports, Presentations & Documents

Technical Report Takeaways

NuLegacy Gold is a listed company with no currently disclosed mineral project. It formerly explored the Red Hill gold property in Eureka County, Nevada, near the Pipeline, Cortez Hills and Goldrush Carlin-type deposits, but suspended exploration in early 2024 after its 2023 drill season returned no economic-grade intercepts, and in April 2025 it reverted the property in full to its underlying owners. Since then its announcements have covered board and officer changes and a 25-to-1 share consolidation, and no replacement project or exploration budget has been announced. No NI 43-101 resource was ever published for Red Hill.