JUNIORMETRICS

Hochschild Mining plc

HCHDF·HOC·US$6.77 (GBP 5.06)·US$3.5B cap
Goldalso:Inmaculada Mine, Peru (plus Pallancata, Peru; San Jose JV 51%, Argentina; Mara Rosa, Brazil; and the Monte do Carmo and Volcan development projects) Map

Hochschild Mining plc is a London-listed precious metals producer whose leading metal is gold: gold made up 67% of its 2025 net revenue and silver 33%, and 64% against 36% in the first half of 2026. It operates the Inmaculada gold-silver mine in Peru, the San Jose gold-silver mine in Argentina (51%) and the Mara Rosa gold mine in Brazil; the Pallancata silver mine in Peru has been on care and maintenance since 2023. Its development projects are Monte do Carmo in Brazil and Volcan in Chile (69.8%). As at 31 December 2025 its attributable Measured and Indicated resources, inclusive of reserves, contain 12,996,900 oz of gold, counting gold where it is a main metal, and 102.4 Moz of silver. First-half 2026 attributable production was 151,830 gold-equivalent ounces, on track for the full-year target of 300,000-328,000.

Notable vs. Peers

  • Jurisdiction risk score of 6/10 is meaningfully riskier than the peer average of 7.8/10.

Lifecycle Milestones

Grassroots
Resource Def.
PEA
PFS
Feasibility
Permitting
Construction
ProductionCurrent

Construction Milestones

5 of 5 reached
  1. Sep 2013 · Source
  2. Reached — date not disclosed · Source
  3. Reached — date not disclosed · Source
  4. Jun 2015 · Source
  5. Reached — date not disclosed · Source

Milestones are recorded only from a company's own dated disclosure. A milestone with no date shown is one we can confirm was reached but for which no date was disclosed — we don't estimate one. "Not yet reached" means exactly that, not that a date is missing. An "Expected" line likewise only ever reflects the company's own guidance (e.g. a study or permit decision targeted for a stated quarter) — most not-yet-reached milestones have none, and that absence means no such guidance has been disclosed, not that one is overdue.

Prior Ownership & Infrastructure
Existing MillTailings FacilityRoad Access3 of 4 checked, 3 in place

Not yet determined: grid power.

5.9/10
Weak track recordStrong track record
5.9/10 vs.
5.8/10
Thin runwayWell-capitalized
5.8/10 vs.
How this is calculated
4.8/10
Weaker depositStronger deposit
4.8/10 vs.
How this is calculated
6.8/10
Harder place to buildEasier place to build
6.8/10 vs.
What goes into it
  • Jurisdiction (40%)6/10

    London-listed but operationally concentrated in Peru (Inmaculada, flagship), with additional exposure to Argentina (San Jose JV) and Brazil (Mara Rosa). Peru carries moderate social-license, permitting, and community-relations risk relative to Tier-1 jurisdictions, partially offset by Hochschild's decades of operating history there.

  • Infrastructure (40%)8.6/10

    A confirmed mill, confirmed road access, and a confirmed tailings facility at Inmaculada Mine; grid power not yet researched, counted at a neutral 5/10 until established.

  • Nearby producing mine (20%)Not yet researched

    No producing mine within 50 km in our reference list (nearest listed: Alpacay (Minera Yanaquihua S.A.C.), 99 km). That list doesn't cover every mining district yet, so a longer distance isn't scored as remote.

5.8/10
Weaker profileStronger profile
5.8/10 vs.
Price Chart
$4.06$5.60$7.64$6.00$6.49AugDecMarJulOct
Aug 12, 2025 – Oct 20, 2026
News
$6.77
+67.1%from low-39.7%from high
$4.05$11.23
See who ↓
38.3%
Low alignmentHigh alignment
38.3% vs.
See who ↓
8.1%
Low alignmentHigh alignment
8.1% vs.
$3.5B
Far belowFar above
$3.5B vs. $541.2M peer median
Price (USD - Local)
US$6.77 (GBP 5.06)
Cash Position (USD)
$309M
Far belowFar above
$309M vs. $91.1M peer median
Debt (USD)
$258M
Far aboveFar below
$258M vs. $6.2M peer median
$3.4B
Far belowFar above
$3.4B vs. $457.8M peer median
514.5M
Far aboveFar below
514.5M vs. 316.1M peer median
Jurisdiction
Peru
12,996,900 oz
Feeds Deposit Quality score
Measured3,649,300 oz
Indicated9,347,600 oz
Inferrednot scored3,221,200 oz
Total resource16,218,100 oz
Far belowFar above
13M oz vs. 1.3M oz peer median
Compares M&I only — Inferred isn't compared or scored.
$264.01/oz
M&I
Total resource (incl. Inferred)$211.58/oz
Peer median $67.95/oz
Far aboveFar below
$264.01/oz vs. $132.92/oz peer median
Underground
$2,448/oz AuEq
38.3%
0%100%
38.3% vs. 12.1% peer median
8.1%
0%100%
8.1% vs. 3.3% peer median
99 kmfrom Minera Yanaquihua S.A.C.'s Alpacay
Outside typical bolt-on range
$386.2M
Far belowFar above
$386.2M vs. $592.2M peer median
$0.751
Far belowFar above
$0.751 vs. $2.11 peer median

Acquisition Susceptibility

How this is calculated
5/10
Unlikely bolt-onFits the takeout profile

A relative ranking of how closely this company matches the profile of juniors that have actually been acquired — not a probability, and not a reason to buy. Acquisitions are rare: only a few dozen significant deals happen a year across a universe of thousands of juniors, so even a high score here describes a long shot. The strongest signal in the research, a producer that already owns part of the company, is scored from its disclosed strategic shareholders. A producer that is a joint-venture or earn-in partner on the project, rather than a shareholder, isn't captured yet.

How this score is built

  • Disclosed pending deal
    Sub-score: Not scored

    No pending acquisition or merger disclosed (checked)

    Not scored: having no deal in flight isn't held against a company.

    Weight 26.25%
  • Producer's strategic stake
    Sub-score: Not scored

    No producer holds a disclosed stake on file (holder register researched) See holders

    Not scored: most juniors that do get bought had no prior toehold, so a missing stake says little either way.

    Weight 25%
  • Distance to a producing mine
    Sub-score:
    3.4/10

    Nearest producing mine: Alpacay (Minera Yanaquihua S.A.C.), 99 km

    10 next to a producing mine, 8 at 20 km, 5 at 50 km, 0 beyond 200 km.

    Weight 22.5% · 46% here
  • Lifecycle stage
    Sub-score:
    5.5/10

    Stage: Production

    Feasibility and permitting score 10, where deals cluster, and production 5.5; earlier stages score less, down to 1 at grassroots.

    Weight 15% · 31% here
  • Jurisdiction
    Sub-score:
    6/10

    Peru: jurisdiction score 6/10

    Our jurisdiction score, used as is: higher means lower political and permitting risk.

    Weight 6.75% · 14% here
  • Commodity
    Sub-score:
    10/10

    Primary commodity: Gold

    Gold 10, copper 8, silver 5, nickel and uranium 4, others 2: most majors' deals are for gold.

    Weight 4.5% · 9% here

Weight is each input's share of the full score. “Here” is its share of this company's score: inputs that aren't scored are left out and the rest re-weighted, never counted as zero.

Overall Score Trend
+0% since 2026-08-08 · -26.6% from peak

Your Rankings

Community Sentiment
—SELLINGBUYING
CategoryCommunityYour Ranking
Overall— (0) 
Management— (0) 
Financials— (0) 
Jurisdiction— (0) 
Project Quality— (0) 

Management Team

Chief Executive Officer of Hochschild Mining plc since Aug 2023, an entirely internal Hochschild progression from General Manager of Argentinian operations (joined Jan 2008), to General Manager of Projects (2011, responsible for the Inmaculada and Crespo Advanced Projects), to Chief Operating Officer (Mar 2013), to CEO. Before Hochschild, Corporate Development Manager at Cementos Pacasmayo SAA (2006-2007), and earlier roles at Peru's Ministry of Energy and Mines and at Repsol S.A. Also currently CEO of Hochschild subsidiary Compania Minera Ares SAC, a Director of Tiernan Gold Corp., and a Non-Independent Director of Aclara Resources Inc.

Chief Financial Officer of Hochschild Mining plc since Dec 2021, an internal Hochschild progression from Head of Group Finance (responsible for financial planning and controls, treasury, corporate finance, tax and accounting) -- joined the company Mar 2007. Actively involved in defining and executing Hochschild's growth strategy, leading several financing and M&A transactions. Before Hochschild, various finance roles at Dell Inc., Union de Cervecerias Peruanas Backus y Johnston, and Del Mar Fishing Company. BA Business Administration, Universidad del Pacifico; MBA, University of Texas.

Insiders, Investors & Smart Money

Notable shareholders and insiders whose involvement is worth knowing about, plus what we're seeing from institutional/large-investor activity.

Smart money
3/10

The disclosed institutional register is almost entirely passive sector ETFs and index funds -- led by BlackRock at 5.11% -- with only a tiny stake from the specialist Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund. Two insiders bought stock on the open market in the past year, though larger insider selling in the same window offsets that buying.

No notable insiders tracked for this miner yet.

Reports, Presentations & Documents

Technical Report Takeaways

Hochschild publishes its resources in its Annual Report and Accounts. As at 31 December 2025, attributable Measured and Indicated resources inclusive of reserves contain 13,178.9 koz of gold and 102.4 Moz of silver. The gold figure shown, 12,996,900 oz (Measured 3,649,300 oz, Indicated 9,347,600 oz; Inferred 3,221,200 oz), counts gold at Inmaculada, San Jose, Mara Rosa, Monte do Carmo and Volcan and leaves out Pallancata, where gold is a by-product of a silver deposit (about 24% of its value at the resource prices). Volcan, a development project in Chile held at 69.8%, accounts for 9,804 koz of the attributable gold. No company-level economic study (NPV or IRR) is published: the producing mines run on annual reserve statements and production guidance.

Recent News

EarningsEarnings EstimateEstimate RevisionsInstitutional InvestorsRatingsUpgrade Downgrade
Result of AGMJun 9, 2026