JUNIORMETRICS

GMV Minerals Inc.

GMVMF·GMV·US$0.11 (CAD 0.15)·US$13.1M cap
GoldMexican Hat (Cochise County, Arizona, USA) Map

GMV Minerals Inc. (TSXV/OTCQB/NASDAQ) is a gold developer advancing its Mexican Hat project in Cochise County, Arizona, USA. A Preliminary Economic Assessment (effective 8 Aug 2025, filed on SEDAR+ 8 Sep 2025, base case US$2,500/oz gold) reported a pre-tax NPV at a 5% discount rate of US$390.2 million and an after-tax NPV of US$268.3 million, a pre-tax IRR of 66.1% and an after-tax IRR of 50.2%, a 10-year mine life, initial capital expenditure of US$89,997,000, and all-in sustaining costs of US$1,545/oz.

Lifecycle Milestones

Grassroots
Resource Def.
PEACurrent
PFS
Feasibility
Permitting
Construction
Production
Prior Ownership & Infrastructure
Road AccessGrid Power2 of 4 checked, 2 in place

Not yet determined: mill, tailings facility.

5.4/10
Weak track recordStrong track record
5.4/10 vs.
5.9/10
Thin runwayWell-capitalized
5.9/10 vs.
How this is calculated
5.1/10
Weaker depositStronger deposit
5.1/10 vs.
How this is calculated
8.5/10
Harder place to buildEasier place to build
8.5/10 vs.
What goes into it
  • Jurisdiction (40%)9/10

    Arizona: Fraser PPI 2025 is 90.73 of 100 (rank 10 of 68), which maps to 9 on this site's scale. Mexican Hat is in Cochise County, Arizona, USA -- a Tier-1 mining jurisdiction with an established permitting regime and long-running heap-leach precedent in-state.

  • Infrastructure (40%)7.9/10

    Confirmed road access and confirmed grid power at Mexican Hat Gold Project, Cochise County, Arizona, USA; existing mill and tailings facility not yet researched, counted at a neutral 5/10 until established.

  • Nearby producing mine (20%)8.7/10

    Johnson Camp (Gunnison Copper Corp.) is 40 km away -- within regional-platform range.

6.2/10
Weaker profileStronger profile
6.2/10 vs.
Price Chart
$0.187$0.144$0.136$0.10$0.107AugDecMarJulOct
Aug 12, 2025 – Oct 20, 2026
News
$0.11
+26.7%from low-53.9%from high
$0.084$0.23
See who ↓
4.9%
Low alignmentHigh alignment
4.9% vs.
See who ↓
0%
Low alignmentHigh alignment
0% vs.
$13.1M
Far belowFar above
$13.1M vs. $22.1M peer median
Price (USD - Local)
US$0.11 (CAD 0.15)
Cash Position (USD)
$2.5M
Far belowFar above
$2.5M vs. $3.4M peer median
Debt (USD)
Far aboveFar below
$0 vs. $0 peer median
$10.6M
Far belowFar above
$10.6M vs. $19.4M peer median
122.7M
Far aboveFar below
122.7M vs. 154.2M peer median
Jurisdiction
United States
Cut-off: 0.20 g/t Au (Mexican Hat inferred resource / PEA cutoff, effective 8 Aug 2025)
PEA-stage, no active mine
10 yrs2025 study
Far belowFar above
10 yrs vs. 11.1 yrs peer median
$1,545/oz2025 study
@5%$268.3M2025 study · gold deck US$2,500 vs spot US$4,114/oz
Far belowFar above
$268.3M vs. $603M peer median
0.05x2025 study · gold deck US$2,500 vs spot US$4,114/oz
Far aboveFar below
0.05x vs. 0.32x peer median
0.04x2025 study · gold deck US$2,500 vs spot US$4,114/oz
Far aboveFar below
0.04x vs. 0.30x peer median
$90M2025 study
Far aboveFar below
$90M vs. $293.2M peer median
3xClears Durrett's 2:1 bar2025 study · gold deck US$2,500 vs spot US$4,114/oz
Far belowFar above
3x vs. 2.3x peer median
$2,500/oz39% below spot ($4,114/oz)2025 study
50%Clears Durrett's 25% developer bar2025 study · gold deck US$2,500 vs spot US$4,114/oz
Far belowFar above
50% vs. 43% peer median
4.9%
0%100%
4.9% vs. 12.1% peer median
0%
0%100%
0% vs. 3.3% peer median
40 kmfrom Gunnison Copper Corp.'s Johnson Camp
Within regional-platform range (~50km)

Acquisition Susceptibility

How this is calculated
6.8/10
Unlikely bolt-onFits the takeout profile

A relative ranking of how closely this company matches the profile of juniors that have actually been acquired — not a probability, and not a reason to buy. Acquisitions are rare: only a few dozen significant deals happen a year across a universe of thousands of juniors, so even a high score here describes a long shot. The strongest signal in the research, a producer that already owns part of the company, is scored from its disclosed strategic shareholders. A producer that is a joint-venture or earn-in partner on the project, rather than a shareholder, isn't captured yet.

How this score is built

  • Disclosed pending deal
    Sub-score: Not scored

    No pending acquisition or merger disclosed (checked)

    Not scored: having no deal in flight isn't held against a company.

    Weight 26.25%
  • Producer's strategic stake
    Sub-score: Not scored

    No producer holds a disclosed stake on file (holder register researched) See holders

    Not scored: most juniors that do get bought had no prior toehold, so a missing stake says little either way.

    Weight 25%
  • Distance to a producing mine
    Sub-score:
    6/10

    Nearest producing mine: Johnson Camp (Gunnison Copper Corp.), 40 km

    10 next to a producing mine, 8 at 20 km, 5 at 50 km, 0 beyond 200 km.

    Weight 22.5% · 46% here
  • Lifecycle stage
    Sub-score:
    6/10

    Stage: Preliminary Economic Assessment

    Feasibility and permitting score 10, where deals cluster, and production 5.5; earlier stages score less, down to 1 at grassroots.

    Weight 15% · 31% here
  • Jurisdiction
    Sub-score:
    9/10

    United States: jurisdiction score 9/10

    Our jurisdiction score, used as is: higher means lower political and permitting risk.

    Weight 6.75% · 14% here
  • Commodity
    Sub-score:
    10/10

    Primary commodity: Gold

    Gold 10, copper 8, silver 5, nickel and uranium 4, others 2: most majors' deals are for gold.

    Weight 4.5% · 9% here

Weight is each input's share of the full score. “Here” is its share of this company's score: inputs that aren't scored are left out and the rest re-weighted, never counted as zero.

Overall Score Trend
-18.4% since 2026-08-11 · -26.2% from peak

Your Rankings

Community Sentiment
—SELLINGBUYING
CategoryCommunityYour Ranking
Overall— (0) 
Management— (0) 
Financials— (0) 
Jurisdiction— (0) 
Project Quality— (0) 

Management Team

President and CEO of Grande Portage Resources Ltd., appointed April 2007; also President/Chief Executive Officer of GMV Minerals Inc. Almost 20 years' experience in business management, public relations, government affairs, and entrepreneurialism; Honours B.A., University of Western Ontario.

Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of Grande Portage Resources Ltd.; also Chief Financial Officer of GMV Minerals Inc. 25 years' experience in the junior mining exploration sector, providing accounting and regulatory assistance to public companies.

Insiders, Investors & Smart Money

Notable shareholders and insiders whose involvement is worth knowing about, plus what we're seeing from institutional/large-investor activity.

Smart money
1/10

Chairman Alistair MacLennan made five separate open-market share purchases between December 2024 and March 2026, a genuine pattern of insider conviction, though all are now more than a year old. No producer or resource-specialist fund holds a disclosed stake.

No notable insiders tracked for this miner yet.

Reports, Presentations & Documents

Technical Report Takeaways

GMV Minerals is advancing the Mexican Hat gold project in Cochise County, Arizona, where it holds a 100% interest in a mining property lease through a subsidiary. A preliminary economic assessment effective 8 August 2025 gives an after-tax NPV (5%) of US$268.3M, a 50.2% after-tax IRR and a 10-year mine life at US$2,500/oz gold, with initial capital of US$89,997,000 and an all-in sustaining cost of US$1,545/oz. The resource behind it is entirely inferred, 688,000 oz of gold in 36.733 Mt at 0.58 g/t. A 16-hole confirmatory and infill drill program, designed to test about 90% of the known mineralisation and potentially upgrade the resource, was completed in 2026 with assays pending.