JUNIORMETRICS
Gold$4,479.95/oz
Silver$66.98/oz
Copper$6.00/lb

Electric Metals (USA) Limited

EML·$0.17·$24.6M cap
OtherNorth Star Manganese Project -- Emily manganese deposit (Emily District, Cuyuna Iron Range, Minnesota, USA) plus a planned US-domestic HPMSM/EMM processing facility Map

Electric Metals (USA) Limited (TSXV: EML, OTCQB: EMUSF, formerly Nevada Silver Corporation until May 2023) is a US-domiciled critical-minerals developer whose principal asset is the Emily manganese deposit in the Cuyuna Iron Range of central Minnesota -- described by the company as the highest-grade manganese deposit in North America. Its North Star Manganese Project pairs an underground mine at Emily with a planned domestic high-purity manganese sulphate monohydrate (HPMSM) and electrolytic manganese metal (EMM) chemical processing facility, with the strategic premise of establishing the first fully domestic US manganese supply chain for battery and steel end-markets. A Preliminary Economic Assessment effective 15 August 2025 reported an after-tax NPV at a 10% discount rate of US$1.390 billion, an after-tax IRR of 43.5%, initial capital expenditure of US$474.8 million including a 25% contingency, 23 years of mine and processing operations within a 25-year project life, and a 23-month payback from start of production, assuming US$2,500 per tonne HPMSM held constant. The mineral resource behind the PEA is 7.60 million tonnes at 19.07% Mn Indicated plus 3.73 million tonnes at 17.04% Mn Inferred. The company is divesting its legacy Nevada silver assets: a definitive agreement effective 30 January 2026 sells subsidiaries North American Silver Corporation and Centennial Mining, holding the Corcoran silver-gold and Belmont silver properties in Nye County, to Ameerex Corporation.

Notable vs. Peers

  • Jurisdiction risk score of 9/10 is meaningfully safer than the peer average of 7.3/10.

Lifecycle Milestones

Grassroots
Resource Def.
PEACurrent
PFS
Feasibility
Permitting
Construction
Production
Weak track recordStrong track record
Thin runwayWell-capitalized
9/10
High riskLow risk
How this is calculated
10/10
Weaker depositStronger deposit
9.5/10
Weaker profileStronger profile
Price Chart
$0.122$0.215$0.226$0.176$0.155AugNovFebJunSep
Aug 12, 2025Sep 4, 2026
News
$0.17
+72%from low-60%from high
$0.10$0.42
See who ↓
27.2%
Low alignmentHigh alignment
See who ↓
0%
Low alignmentHigh alignment
$24.6M
Far belowFar above
$13.5M median
Price (USD - Local)
$0.17 - CAD 0.23
Cash Position (USD)
This company's data hasn't been researched yet
Debt (USD)
This company's data hasn't been researched yet
$24.6M
Far belowFar above
$14.3M median
201.9M
Far aboveFar below
280.2M median
Jurisdiction
United States
This company's data hasn't been researched yet
This company's data hasn't been researched yet
Cut-off: 10% Mn cut-off -- current PEA-supporting resource vintage, effective 2025-08-15: Indicated 7.60Mt @ 19.07% Mn, Inferred 3.73Mt @ 17.04% Mn (matches DB's own description exactly). Corroborated by the earlier vintage (effective 2023-12-31, announced 2024-04-09), also reported at 10% Mn: Indicated 6.2Mt @ 19.27% Mn, Inferred 4.9Mt @ 17.50% Mn (that same earlier vintage was also separately reported at a 5% Mn lower-grade cut: Indicated 14.5Mt @ 12.06% Mn, Inferred 9.6Mt @ 12.11% Mn -- not the governing cut for the current PEA).
This company's data hasn't been researched yet
N/A -- PEA-stage, no active mine
23 yrs
Far belowFar above
20 yrs median
All-In Sustaining Cost
@10%$1.4B(at $2,500/USD_PER_TONNE)
Far belowFar above
$614.7M median
0.02x
Far aboveFar below
0.26x median
$474.8M
Not enough peer companies report this metric
2.9xClears Durrett's 2:1 bar
Not enough peer data yet
$2,500/USD_PER_TONNE
44%Clears Durrett's 25% developer bar
Far belowFar above
26% median
27.2%
0%100%
27% median
0%
0%100%
0% median
234 kmfrom New Gold Inc.'s Rainy River
Outside typical bolt-on range
This company's data hasn't been researched yet
This company's data hasn't been researched yet
This company's data hasn't been researched yet
This company's data hasn't been researched yet
This company's data hasn't been researched yet
Acquisition Susceptibility
3.3/10
Unlikely bolt-onFits the takeout profile

A relative ranking of how closely this company matches the profile of juniors that have actually been acquired — not a probability, and not a reason to buy. Acquisitions are rare: only a few dozen significant deals happen a year across a universe of thousands of juniors, so even a high score here describes a long shot. The strongest signal the underlying research identifies — whether a major already holds a JV, earn-in, or 5–19.9% strategic stake — isn't tracked yet and is absent from this score.

Overall Score Trend
+0% since 2026-08-11

Your Rankings

Community Sentiment
SELLINGBUYING
CategoryCommunityYour Ranking
Overall (0)Log in to rank
Management (0)Log in to rank
Financials (0)Log in to rank
Jurisdiction (0)Log in to rank
Project Quality (0)Log in to rank

Management Team

No one tracked here yet.

Insiders, Investors & Smart Money

Notable shareholders and insiders whose involvement is worth knowing about, plus what we're seeing from institutional/large-investor activity.

Smart money
3/10

Eric Sprott's personal investment vehicle increased its stake in a real, cash-funded private placement in October 2025, taking his position to roughly 9-11% depending on how warrants are counted -- and the increase itself triggered a Canadian early-warning filing at the 10% threshold. No genuine open-market insider buying or institutional holder was found.

No notable insiders tracked for this miner yet.

Reports, Presentations & Documents

Technical Report Takeaways

North Star Manganese Project PEA, effective 15 Aug 2025. Mineral Resource: 7,600.4 kt at 19.07% Mn Indicated plus 3,725.3 kt at 17.04% Mn Inferred. Because this is a manganese tonnage/grade resource and not a precious-metal ounce count, it is recorded here rather than written to ouncesFound. Economics: after-tax NPV10% US$1.390B, after-tax IRR 43.5%, initial capex US$474.8M (incl. 25% contingency), 23 years of mine and processing operations within a 25-year project life, 23-month payback from start of production, at US$2,500/t HPMSM held constant for life of project. The PEA discloses an NPV at 10% only -- no 5% (or other rate) NPV is published -- so 10% IS this study's base-case rate: the US$1.390B figure is recorded in dcfNpvUsd with dcfNpvDiscountRatePct = 10, never back-derived to a 5% equivalent. This follows the same base-case-primacy convention as the other rate-10 rows on file (AAU, GBU, MSA, TGM) and SGO's 8% PEA. dcfNpvUsd10Pct is deliberately null: that field is the 10% sanity check on a headline disclosed at some OTHER rate, and this study publishes no such headline.