JUNIORMETRICS

Doubleview Gold Corp.

DBLVF·DBG·US$1.02 (CAD 1.43)·US$239.4M cap
Copperalso:Hat Polymetallic Project (Sphaler Zone), British Columbia Map

Doubleview's 100%-owned, ~18,000-hectare Hat Project in BC's Golden Triangle: a Feb 25, 2026 NI 43-101 MRE outlined 609Mt Measured & Indicated at 0.43% CuEq (5.82B lbs CuEq) plus 503Mt Inferred at 0.41% CuEq (4.57B lbs CuEq), with copper, gold, silver, cobalt and scandium credits. A March 2026 PEA reported a base-case after-tax NPV5% of C$6.73B and 23% IRR (C$13.53B NPV/39% IRR at spot prices).

Lifecycle Milestones

Grassroots
Resource Def.
PEACurrent
PFS
Feasibility
Permitting
Construction
Production
Prior Ownership & Infrastructure
3 of 4 checked, 0 in place

Not in place: mill, tailings facility, road access. Not yet determined: grid power.

5.4/10
Weak track recordStrong track record
5.4/10 vs.
5/10
Thin runwayWell-capitalized
5/10 vs.
How this is calculated
7.2/10
Weaker depositStronger deposit
7.2/10 vs.
How this is calculated
5.2/10
Harder place to buildEasier place to build
5.2/10 vs.
What goes into it
  • Jurisdiction (40%)9/10

    British Columbia: Fraser PPI 2025 is 74.28 of 100 (rank 31 of 68), which maps to 9 on this site's scale. British Columbia, Canada — top-tier, low political-risk mining jurisdiction.

  • Infrastructure (40%)1.4/10

    No confirmed mill, no confirmed road access, and no confirmed tailings facility at Hat Polymetallic Project (Sphaler Zone), British Columbia; grid power not yet researched, counted at a neutral 5/10 until established.

  • Nearby producing mine (20%)Not yet researched

    No producing mine within 50 km in our reference list (nearest listed: Red Chris (Newmont Corporation / Imperial Metals), 119 km). That list doesn't cover every mining district yet, so a longer distance isn't scored as remote.

5.7/10
Weaker profileStronger profile
5.7/10 vs.
Price Chart
$0.359$0.926$1.64$1.39$1.04AugDecAprJulOct2
Aug 12, 2025 – Oct 20, 2026
News
$1.02
+107%from low-58.6%from high
$0.49$2.46
See who ↓
13.7%
Low alignmentHigh alignment
13.7% vs.
See who ↓
5.1%
Low alignmentHigh alignment
5.1% vs.
$239.4M
Far belowFar above
$239.4M vs. $28M peer median
Price (USD - Local)
US$1.02 (CAD 1.43)
Cash Position (USD)
$9.8M
Far belowFar above
$9.8M vs. $3.8M peer median
Debt (USD)
$120.7K
Far aboveFar below
$120.7K vs. $0 peer median
$229.8M
Far belowFar above
$229.8M vs. $25.1M peer median
235.4M
Far aboveFar below
235.4M vs. 171.1M peer median
Jurisdiction
Canada
2,420,000,000 lb Cu
Feeds Deposit Quality score
Measured1,110,000,000 lb Cu
Indicated1,310,000,000 lb Cu
Inferrednot scored1,720,000,000 lb Cu
Total resource4,140,000,000 lb Cu
Far belowFar above
2.4B lb vs. 2.1B lb peer median
Compares M&I only — Inferred isn't compared or scored.
$0.095/lb
M&I
Total resource (incl. Inferred)$0.056/lb
Peer median $0.042/lb
Far aboveFar below
$0.095/lb vs. $0.083/lb peer median
Cut-off: 0.2% CuEq
Open pit
25 yrs2026 study
Far belowFar above
25 yrs vs. 17.5 yrs peer median
$2.03/lb CuEq2026 study
@5%$4.9B2026 study · copper deck US$4.88 vs reference US$6.14/lb
Far belowFar above
$4.9B vs. $1B peer median
0.05x2026 study · copper deck US$4.88 vs reference US$6.14/lb
Far aboveFar below
0.05x vs. 0.36x peer median
0.05x2026 study · copper deck US$4.88 vs reference US$6.14/lb
Far aboveFar below
0.05x vs. 0.28x peer median
$2.6B2026 study
Far aboveFar below
$2.6B vs. $546M peer median
1.9xBelow Durrett's 2:1 bar2026 study · copper deck US$4.88 vs reference US$6.14/lb
Far belowFar above
1.9x vs. 1.1x peer median
$4.88/lb21% below reference ($6.14/lb)2026 study
23%Below Durrett's 25% developer bar2026 study · copper deck US$4.88 vs reference US$6.14/lb
Far belowFar above
23% vs. 23% peer median
13.7%
0%100%
13.7% vs. 9.9% peer median
5.1%
0%100%
5.1% vs. 2.7% peer median
119 kmfrom Newmont Corporation (70%) / Imperial Metals's Red Chris
Outside typical bolt-on range
-$6M
Far belowFar above
-$6M vs. -$3.8M peer median
-$0.026
Far belowFar above
-$0.026 vs. -$0.018 peer median

Acquisition Susceptibility

How this is calculated
6.8/10
Unlikely bolt-onFits the takeout profile

A relative ranking of how closely this company matches the profile of juniors that have actually been acquired — not a probability, and not a reason to buy. Acquisitions are rare: only a few dozen significant deals happen a year across a universe of thousands of juniors, so even a high score here describes a long shot. The strongest signal in the research, a producer that already owns part of the company, is scored from its disclosed strategic shareholders. A producer that is a joint-venture or earn-in partner on the project, rather than a shareholder, isn't captured yet.

How this score is built

  • Disclosed pending deal
    Sub-score:
    10/10

    Disclosed pending acquisition

    A disclosed pending acquisition scores 10 and a merger 8.5; any other corporate action, none, or a deal in which the company is the buyer isn't scored.

    Weight 26.25% · 35% here
  • Producer's strategic stake
    Sub-score: Not scored

    No producer holds a disclosed stake on file (holder register researched) See holders

    Not scored: most juniors that do get bought had no prior toehold, so a missing stake says little either way.

    Weight 25%
  • Distance to a producing mine
    Sub-score:
    2.7/10

    Nearest producing mine: Red Chris (Newmont Corporation / Imperial Metals), 119 km

    10 next to a producing mine, 8 at 20 km, 5 at 50 km, 0 beyond 200 km.

    Weight 22.5% · 30% here
  • Lifecycle stage
    Sub-score:
    6/10

    Stage: Preliminary Economic Assessment

    Feasibility and permitting score 10, where deals cluster, and production 5.5; earlier stages score less, down to 1 at grassroots.

    Weight 15% · 20% here
  • Jurisdiction
    Sub-score:
    9/10

    Canada: jurisdiction score 9/10

    Our jurisdiction score, used as is: higher means lower political and permitting risk.

    Weight 6.75% · 9% here
  • Commodity
    Sub-score:
    8/10

    Primary commodity: Copper

    Gold 10, copper 8, silver 5, nickel and uranium 4, others 2: most majors' deals are for gold.

    Weight 4.5% · 6% here

Weight is each input's share of the full score. “Here” is its share of this company's score: inputs that aren't scored are left out and the rest re-weighted, never counted as zero.

Overall Score Trend
+0% since 2026-07-31 · -19.7% from peak

Your Rankings

Community Sentiment
—SELLINGBUYING
CategoryCommunityYour Ranking
Overall— (0) 
Management— (0) 
Financials— (0) 
Jurisdiction— (0) 
Project Quality— (0) 

Management Team

Chief Executive Officer and President of Doubleview Gold Corp.; also President & Chief Executive Officer (Founder) of Casa Minerals Inc. (MSc. Geol.) Over 25 years' geological expertise in mineral exploration. Holds B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees in geology from Shiraz University, Iran. President of Terracad Geoscience Services Ltd.; served over seven years on the board of Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. (TSX-V), which was acquired by Osisko Gold Royalties for $338 million. CEO since June 2011.

Chief Financial Officer of both Doubleview Gold Corp. and Harvest Gold Corporation. Over 20 years' corporate accounting and audit experience for public mining companies, having held senior positions including Director, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary. Chartered Accountant since February 2009 and Certified General Accountant since 2004. Prior audit experience with KPMG and Davidson & Co. LLP in Vancouver, auditing junior public companies and working as an IPO specialist.

Insiders, Investors & Smart Money

Notable shareholders and insiders whose involvement is worth knowing about, plus what we're seeing from institutional/large-investor activity.

Smart money
1/10

The company launched a formal strategic review in June 2026 focused on a possible sale, but that reflects outbound interest in acquiring the company, not third-party investors taking a position. Two directors sold stock extensively and consistently through 2025-2026 with no offsetting buying.

No notable insiders tracked for this miner yet.

Reports, Presentations & Documents

Technical Report Takeaways

Despite its name, Doubleview Gold is primarily a copper developer: its 100%-owned, roughly 18,000-hectare Hat polymetallic porphyry project in British Columbia's Golden Triangle carries copper, gold, silver, cobalt and scandium. The resource estimate effective 25 February 2026 has 609 Mt measured and indicated at 0.43% CuEq plus 503 Mt inferred at 0.41% CuEq, at a 0.2% CuEq cut-off. The base case (Scenario A2) of the March 2026 preliminary economic assessment shows an after-tax NPV5% of US$4,911M (CAD 6,727M) and a 23% IRR at US$4.88/lb copper, with initial capital of US$2,628.5M (CAD 3,601M), a 25-year mine life at 120,000 t/d and an all-in sustaining cost of US$2.03/lb of copper equivalent. In June 2026 the company began a formal strategic review with Canaccord Genuity as financial adviser, focused mainly on a potential sale of the company or the Hat project.