JUNIORMETRICS

Austral Gold Limited

AGLDF·AGLD·AGD·US$0.11 (CAD 0.15)·US$65.3M cap
Goldalso:Guanaco-Amancaya Mine Complex, Chile (and Casposo-Manantiales, Argentina) Map

Austral Gold operates two producing complexes: Guanaco-Amancaya in Chile (2026 guidance 15,000-17,000 gold-equivalent oz via heap-reprocessing) and the smaller Casposo-Manantiales silver-gold complex in San Juan, Argentina (2026 guidance 11,000-13,000 GEOs after a production restart). FY2025 combined output was 15,392 gold-equivalent ounces. The company materially deleveraged in H1 2026, cutting net financial debt from US$16.1 million to US$1.7 million.

Notable vs. Peers

  • Financials score of 10/10 is stronger than the peer average of 6.5/10.
  • All-in sustaining cost of $2,954/oz is 65% higher than the peer producer average of $1,792/oz.

Lifecycle Milestones

Grassroots
Resource Def.
PEA
PFS
Feasibility
Permitting
Construction
ProductionCurrent

Construction Milestones

5 of 5 reached
  1. Reached — date not disclosed · Source
  2. Reached — date not disclosed · Source
  3. Reached — date not disclosed · Source
  4. Reached — date not disclosed · Source
  5. Reached — date not disclosed · Source

Milestones are recorded only from a company's own dated disclosure. A milestone with no date shown is one we can confirm was reached but for which no date was disclosed — we don't estimate one. "Not yet reached" means exactly that, not that a date is missing. An "Expected" line likewise only ever reflects the company's own guidance (e.g. a study or permit decision targeted for a stated quarter) — most not-yet-reached milestones have none, and that absence means no such guidance has been disclosed, not that one is overdue.

Prior Ownership & Infrastructure
Guanaco-Amancaya
Existing MillTailings FacilityRoad AccessGrid Power10/10 built out
Casposo-Manantiales
Existing MillTailings FacilityRoad AccessGrid Power10/10 built out

Combined view across 2 projects. Figures below are only combined where the underlying basis genuinely matches -- see the notes under each.

Combined resource
618K oz Au
Sum of 2 of 2 projects with a disclosed figure
IRR, per project
—
No project has a disclosed IRR yet
Mine life, per project
  • 14 yrsGuanaco-Amancaya
  • 6.2 yrsCasposo-Manantiales
Each project's own figure -- independent mine lives are never added or averaged
Combined NPV, by discount-rate basis
$192.1M
At 10% discount rate -- Guanaco-Amancaya
$72.7M
At 11.8% discount rate -- Casposo-Manantiales

Shown as separate totals, not summed together: these projects' studies used different discount rates, so a single combined NPV would not be a real number.

4.7/10
Weak track recordStrong track record
4.7/10 vs.
10/10
Thin runwayWell-capitalized
10/10 vs.
How this is calculated
3.3/10
Weaker depositStronger deposit
3.3/10 vs.
How this is calculated
8.2/10
Harder place to buildEasier place to build
8.2/10 vs.
What goes into it
  • Jurisdiction (40%)8/10

    Chile is a stable, well-tested mining jurisdiction but slower-moving on permitting than top-tier North American/Australian provinces.

  • Infrastructure (40%)10/10

    A confirmed mill, confirmed road access, confirmed grid power, and a confirmed tailings facility at Guanaco-Amancaya.

  • Nearby producing mine (20%)Not yet researched

    No project coordinates on file yet, so distance to a producing mine can't be measured.

6.6/10
Weaker profileStronger profile
6.6/10 vs.
Price Chart
$0.032$0.065$0.111$0.086$0.103AugDecAprJulOct
Aug 12, 2025 – Oct 20, 2026
News
$0.11
+237.8%from low-36.7%from high
$0.032$0.17
$65.3M
Far belowFar above
$65.3M vs. $585.3M peer median
Price (USD - Local)
US$0.11 (CAD 0.15)
Cash Position (USD)
$20.3M
Far belowFar above
$20.3M vs. $94M peer median
Debt (USD)
$1.7M
Far aboveFar below
$1.7M vs. $6.5M peer median
$46.7M
Far belowFar above
$46.7M vs. $505.2M peer median
612.3M
Far aboveFar below
612.3M vs. 316.1M peer median
Jurisdiction
Chile
618,000 oz
Feeds Deposit Quality score
Far belowFar above
618K oz vs. 1.3M oz peer median
$75.61/oz
Far aboveFar below
$75.61/oz vs. $132.67/oz peer median
0.0291 oz/t
Far belowFar above
0.0291 oz/t vs. 0.0383 oz/t peer median
Open pit
See projects ↓
$2,954/oz
See projects ↓
See projects ↓
See projects ↓
70.6%
0%100%
70.6% vs. 12.1% peer median
$872K
Far belowFar above
$872K vs. $52.7M peer median
$0.001
Far belowFar above
$0.001 vs. $0.164 peer median
74.92x
Far aboveFar below
74.92x vs. 22.67x peer median

Acquisition Susceptibility

How this is calculated
6.9/10
Unlikely bolt-onFits the takeout profile

A relative ranking of how closely this company matches the profile of juniors that have actually been acquired — not a probability, and not a reason to buy. Acquisitions are rare: only a few dozen significant deals happen a year across a universe of thousands of juniors, so even a high score here describes a long shot. The strongest signal in the research, a producer that already owns part of the company, is scored from its disclosed strategic shareholders. A producer that is a joint-venture or earn-in partner on the project, rather than a shareholder, isn't captured yet.

How this score is built

  • Disclosed pending deal
    Sub-score: Not scored

    No pending acquisition or merger disclosed (checked)

    Not scored: having no deal in flight isn't held against a company.

    Weight 26.25%
  • Producer's strategic stake
    Sub-score: Not scored

    No producer holds a disclosed stake on file (holder register researched) See holders

    Not scored: most juniors that do get bought had no prior toehold, so a missing stake says little either way.

    Weight 25%
  • Distance to a producing mine
    Sub-score: Not yet researched

    Distance not yet researched: no project coordinates on file

    Distance can't be measured without coordinates, so excluded rather than counted as far.

    Weight 22.5%
  • Lifecycle stage
    Sub-score:
    5.5/10

    Stage: Production

    Feasibility and permitting score 10, where deals cluster, and production 5.5; earlier stages score less, down to 1 at grassroots.

    Weight 15% · 57% here
  • Jurisdiction
    Sub-score:
    8/10

    Chile: jurisdiction score 8/10

    Our jurisdiction score, used as is: higher means lower political and permitting risk.

    Weight 6.75% · 26% here
  • Commodity
    Sub-score:
    10/10

    Primary commodity: Gold

    Gold 10, copper 8, silver 5, nickel and uranium 4, others 2: most majors' deals are for gold.

    Weight 4.5% · 17% here

Weight is each input's share of the full score. “Here” is its share of this company's score: inputs that aren't scored are left out and the rest re-weighted, never counted as zero.

Overall Score Trend
-26.7% since 2026-08-01 · -26.7% from peak

Your Rankings

Community Sentiment
—SELLINGBUYING
CategoryCommunityYour Ranking
Overall— (0) 
Management— (0) 
Financials— (0) 
Jurisdiction— (0) 
Project Quality— (0) 

Management Team

CEO and Executive Director of Austral Gold Limited, CEO since 2017. Geology degree, Universidad Catolica del Norte, Chile; 20+ years in gold-deposit geology/exploration focused on Chile's Paleocene belt; former VP Operations at Andean Resources; was COO of Austral Gold from September 2009, leading the 2010 restart of the Guanaco mine.

Chief Financial Officer of Austral Gold Limited, effective 1 May 2022 (rejoined the company after originally serving there circa 2013-2014 and resigning 27 Feb 2022). Accounting degree (Pontificia Universidad Catolica Argentina), Master's in Corporate Finance (Universidad del CEMA) and Master's in International Business (University of Sydney); prior roles at IFC and Deloitte & Touche in Latin America; 10+ years finance/accounting experience.

Non-Executive Chairman of Austral Gold Limited since 29 June 2007.

Non-Executive Director of Austral Gold Limited since 29 June 2007.

Non-Executive Director of Austral Gold Limited since 18 May 2006; member of the Audit and Risk Committee. Lawyer and professor of Capital Markets, Contracts, Corporate Law and Business Law (postgraduate level), Argentine Catholic University.

Independent Non-Executive Director of Austral Gold Limited since 10 April 2007; Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee.

Independent Non-Executive Director of Austral Gold Limited since 2 June 2011; member of the Audit and Risk Committee.

Insiders, Investors & Smart Money

Notable shareholders and insiders whose involvement is worth knowing about, plus what we're seeing from institutional/large-investor activity.

Smart money
3/10

Eduardo Elsztain, the well-known Argentine financier who chairs IRSA and Cresud and has a long history of investing in South American mining, controls roughly 69-74% of Austral Gold through his associated entities -- most recently reported at 69.05% in February 2026, down from 74.27% in December 2025 purely from dilution in a share issuance, not from selling. That is a dominant, long-standing position rather than a fresh conviction bet, but it is real and it is sophisticated money. A February 2026 placement also brought in new Australian institutional investors, though none were individually named.

No notable insiders tracked for this miner yet.

Reports, Presentations & Documents

Technical Report Takeaways

Austral Gold operates two producing complexes, Guanaco-Amancaya in Chile and the smaller Casposo-Manantiales silver-gold complex in San Juan, Argentina, and guides 2026 production of 15,000-17,000 gold-equivalent ounces at Guanaco and 11,000-13,000 at Casposo after a restart. Measured and indicated resources total 618,000 oz of gold: Guanaco's 511,000 oz as at 30 November 2025 and Casposo's 107,000 oz as at 30 June 2025. Guanaco's updated technical report, effective 31 May 2026, shows an after-tax NPV10% of US$192.1M over a 14-year mine life, and its all-in sustaining cost in Q2 2026 was US$2,954/oz, after production rose 17% with additional crushing capacity. Casposo added a toll-processing revenue stream in Q2 2026, and its June 2025 reserve update shows an after-tax NPV of US$72.7M at an 11.8% discount rate over a 6.2-year mine life.